2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820780116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectomics of affective and psychotic pathology

Abstract: Converging evidence indicates that groups of patients with nominally distinct psychiatric diagnoses are not separated by sharp or discontinuous neurobiological boundaries. In healthy populations, individual differences in behavior are reflected in variability across the collective set of functional brain connections (functional connectome). These data suggest that the spectra of transdiagnostic symptom profiles observed in psychiatric patients may map onto detectable patterns of network function. To examine th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
91
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
15
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in the case of mental health measures, while diagnostically distinct psychiatric disorders are likely the result of differentially disrupted brain systems, there is significant comorbidity among disorders and overlap in clinical symptoms (Kessler et al 2011, Tamminga et al 2013, Russo et al 2014 . Certain brain circuits have also been disproportionately reported to be transdiagnostically aberrant across multiple psychiatric and neurological disorders (Menon 2011, Whitfield-Gabrieli and Ford 2012, Goodkind et al 2015, Baker et al 2019, Kebets et al 2019 . For instance, there is evidence for the core role of frontoparietal network disruptions across psychiatric diagnosis (Cole, Repovš, et al 2014) .…”
Section: Predictive Brain Network Features Cluster Together Within Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the case of mental health measures, while diagnostically distinct psychiatric disorders are likely the result of differentially disrupted brain systems, there is significant comorbidity among disorders and overlap in clinical symptoms (Kessler et al 2011, Tamminga et al 2013, Russo et al 2014 . Certain brain circuits have also been disproportionately reported to be transdiagnostically aberrant across multiple psychiatric and neurological disorders (Menon 2011, Whitfield-Gabrieli and Ford 2012, Goodkind et al 2015, Baker et al 2019, Kebets et al 2019 . For instance, there is evidence for the core role of frontoparietal network disruptions across psychiatric diagnosis (Cole, Repovš, et al 2014) .…”
Section: Predictive Brain Network Features Cluster Together Within Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectomics is not only crucial for studying organizational principles in the healthy human brain, but also in disease. Aberrant functional integration has been observed in most psychiatric and neurological disorders [15][16][17][18] However, to render connectomics useful for understanding large-scale brain networks and alterations thereof, individual connection estimates have to be neurobiologically interpretable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, our whole-cortex analyses revealed a surprising pattern of slightly increased visual cortex thickness in patients relative to controls (Figure 1), an effect that may be missed by small samples or hypothesis driven examinations of select brain areas. Of interest, this anatomical effect may, at least in part, explain patterns of increased functional connectivity in occipital cortex, reported both here through other collection efforts 73 . We also find that MDD and trait negative affect were associated with distributed functional changes that dissociate unimodal versus heteromodal cortex ( Supplementary Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%