Connectomics is essential for understanding large-scale brain networks but requires that individual connection estimates are neurobiologically interpretable. In particular, a principle of brain organization is that reciprocal connections between cortical areas are functionally asymmetric. This is a challenge for fMRI-based connectomics in humans where only undirected functional connectivity estimates are routinely available. By contrast, whole-brain estimates of effective (directed) connectivity are computationally challenging, and emerging methods require empirical validation.Here, using a motor task at 7T, we demonstrate that a novel generative model can infer known connectivity features in a whole-brain network (>200 regions, >40,000 connections) highly efficiently. Furthermore, graph-theoretical analyses of directed connectivity estimates identify functional roles of motor areas more accurately than undirected functional connectivity estimates. These results, which can be achieved in an entirely unsupervised manner, demonstrate the feasibility of inferring directed connections in whole-brain networks and open new avenues for human connectomics.
KEYWORDSRegression dynamic causal modeling, rDCM, generative model, effective connectivity, connectomics, visuomotor network macroscopic level. In brief, structural connectivity refers to white-matter fiber tracts that can be measured using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) 24 , whereas functional connectivity relates to statistical interdependencies between fMRI signals and is computed using simple correlation analyses or more sophisticated statistical techniques (for a comprehensive review, see 25 ).Unfortunately, inferring directed estimates of functional interactions (i.e., effective connectivity) at the whole-brain level has proven challenging, mainly due to computational limitations. While various models of effective connectivity have been proposed over the last decade 26 , including dynamic causal models (DCMs) 27 and biophysical network models (BNMs) 28,29 , these methods are limited in either the network size that can be considered (DCM) or the ability to identify individual connection strengths (BNM). While recent progress has been made in both domains 30-32 , computational efficiency and identifiability remain problematic and/or unknown. In addition to methodological refinements, basic empirical validation studies are required that challenge models to rediscover known sets of connections from whole-brain fMRI data.We have recently introduced a novel method that enables connection-specific estimates of effective connectivity in whole-brain networks. This method -termed regression dynamic causal modeling (rDCM) 33,34 -is promising for several reasons: First, rDCM is computationally highly efficient and scales gracefully to large networks that comprise hundreds of nodes. Second, the model can exploit structural connectivity information to constrain inference on directed functional interactions or, where no such information is available, infer optimally sparse...