2011
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism

Abstract: Group differences in resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity between individuals with autism and typically developing controls have been widely replicated for a small number of discrete brain regions, yet the whole-brain distribution of connectivity abnormalities in autism is not well characterized. It is also unclear whether functional connectivity is sufficiently robust to be used as a diagnostic or prognostic metric in individual patients with autism. We obtained pairwise functional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

23
311
5
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
23
311
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These connections were positive on average in ASD, but negative on average in controls. Previous studies have also reported reduced negative connectivity in ASD, which was described as reduced functional segregation of networks (Rudie et al, 2012; or underconnectivity of long-range inhibitory connections (Anderson et al, 2011b). Our results show that despite distinct differences in static FC between subtypes, atypical FC within certain networks is consistent across all ASD participants compared to controls.…”
Section: Cc-by-nc-nd 40 International License Peer-reviewed) Is the supporting
confidence: 66%
“…These connections were positive on average in ASD, but negative on average in controls. Previous studies have also reported reduced negative connectivity in ASD, which was described as reduced functional segregation of networks (Rudie et al, 2012; or underconnectivity of long-range inhibitory connections (Anderson et al, 2011b). Our results show that despite distinct differences in static FC between subtypes, atypical FC within certain networks is consistent across all ASD participants compared to controls.…”
Section: Cc-by-nc-nd 40 International License Peer-reviewed) Is the supporting
confidence: 66%
“…In particular, most task‐based studies focus their connectivity analyses on the regions that activate in response to the studied paradigm, ignoring functional interplays that may occur elsewhere in the brain (Wass, 2011). Also, despite the interest in task‐driven functional changes, the presence of intrinsic FC (iFC) variations (Damoiseaux et al, 2006; van den Heuvel & Pol, 2010; Hutchison, Womelsdorf, Gati, Everling, & Menon, 2013b) is never analytically accounted for; yet, iFC is altered throughout the brain in ASD (see for example Anderson et al, 2011; Cherkassky, Kana, Keller, & Just, 2006; Yahata et al, 2016). In some cases, ASD‐specific FC patterns put forward as caused by the studied task may thus reflect iFC group differences, or task‐driven effects may be overshadowed by iFC fluctuations and fail to be revealed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7-11), and detecting brain changes in disease. Functional connectivity changes have been identified in diverse conditions including Alzheimer's disease (6,(12)(13)(14), Parkinson's disease (15,16), multiple sclerosis (17,18), autism (19), depression (20,21), and schizophrenia (22,23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%