2004
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional compatibility between isoform α and β of type II DNA topoisomerase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

17
85
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
17
85
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of suitable topoII mutants, in vivo studies in higher eukaryotes have made use of topoII inhibitors (Andoh et al, 1993;Downes et al, 1994;Gorbsky, 1994;Ishida et al, 1994;Gimenez-Abian et al, 1995;Andreassen et al, 1997;Gimenez-Abian et al, 2000) or RNA interference (Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004). Such studies mostly support a role for topoII in chromosome condensation, but again, condensation was impaired to varying degrees, and in some cases (Andreassen et al, 1997;Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004) impairment was surprisingly mild or absent. Thus, although both structural (Mirkovitch et al, 1988;Hart and Laemmli, 1998) and catalytic (Koshland and Strunnikov, 1996;Hirano, 2000) models for how topoII may be involved in chromosome condensation have been proposed, the issue of whether topoII is required for condensation remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the absence of suitable topoII mutants, in vivo studies in higher eukaryotes have made use of topoII inhibitors (Andoh et al, 1993;Downes et al, 1994;Gorbsky, 1994;Ishida et al, 1994;Gimenez-Abian et al, 1995;Andreassen et al, 1997;Gimenez-Abian et al, 2000) or RNA interference (Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004). Such studies mostly support a role for topoII in chromosome condensation, but again, condensation was impaired to varying degrees, and in some cases (Andreassen et al, 1997;Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004) impairment was surprisingly mild or absent. Thus, although both structural (Mirkovitch et al, 1988;Hart and Laemmli, 1998) and catalytic (Koshland and Strunnikov, 1996;Hirano, 2000) models for how topoII may be involved in chromosome condensation have been proposed, the issue of whether topoII is required for condensation remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro studies of chromosome condensation in mitotic extracts (Newport and Spann, 1987;Adachi et al, 1991;Hirano and Mitchison, 1991, 1993), in which topoII is immunodepleted or inactivated by inhibitors, showed varying requirements for topoII. In the absence of suitable topoII mutants, in vivo studies in higher eukaryotes have made use of topoII inhibitors (Andoh et al, 1993;Downes et al, 1994;Gorbsky, 1994;Ishida et al, 1994;Gimenez-Abian et al, 1995;Andreassen et al, 1997;Gimenez-Abian et al, 2000) or RNA interference (Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004). Such studies mostly support a role for topoII in chromosome condensation, but again, condensation was impaired to varying degrees, and in some cases (Andreassen et al, 1997;Chang et al, 2003;Sakaguchi and Kikuchi, 2004) impairment was surprisingly mild or absent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genetic studies using model organisms as well as RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated gene silencing analyses using human cell lines indicated that DNA topoisomerase II (topoII) and a protein complex termed condensin play a crucial role in the process of mitotic chromosomal condensation. [1][2][3] Inhibition or depletion of these molecules induces chromosomal mis-segregation and subsequent tetraploidy. [2][3][4] Such tetraploid errors were revealed to occur spontaneously in growing cells and facilitate tumor development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Inhibition or depletion of these molecules induces chromosomal mis-segregation and subsequent tetraploidy. [2][3][4] Such tetraploid errors were revealed to occur spontaneously in growing cells and facilitate tumor development. [5][6][7] Therefore, such dangerous tetraploid cells should not progress through the cell cycle and should be eliminated in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%