2018
DOI: 10.21276/ijcmr.2018.5.6.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional, Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Extra Articular Distal End Radius Fracture in Elderly Patients, Closed Reduction and Cross K-wiring Versus Conservative Management (Closed Reduction and Casting)

Abstract: Introduction: Fractures of the distal radius constitute one of the common skeletal injuries. This type of fracture usually results from low energy trauma in the elderly with low functional demand. The optimal method of obtaining and maintaining an accurate reduction remains a topic of controversy. Study was done with the aim to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcome in patients with extraarticular distal end radius fractures treated with i.e., closed reduction and cast or with closed reduct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant results were obtained while comparing the Ulnar variance at different postoperative time intervals. Similar results have been reported in the past literature [9,10,11,12] . In another study conducted by Chung PY et al [13] , the mean radial height, radial inclination, radial tilt and ulnar variance measures before fracture reduction were 9.22 mm, 19.08 degrees, −14.67 degrees and 2.83 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Significant results were obtained while comparing the Ulnar variance at different postoperative time intervals. Similar results have been reported in the past literature [9,10,11,12] . In another study conducted by Chung PY et al [13] , the mean radial height, radial inclination, radial tilt and ulnar variance measures before fracture reduction were 9.22 mm, 19.08 degrees, −14.67 degrees and 2.83 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%