2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional characterization of 40 CYP2B6 allelic variants by assessing efavirenz 8-hydroxylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the IRUD project (Japan's Initiative on Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases 9 ) used the reference panel to reduce the discovery of false positive single nucleotide variants (SNVs) during the exome analyses of undiagnosed patients. In another project, CYP SNVs included in the reference panels were selected and analyzed systematically for their effect on drug metabolism [10][11][12] . As seen from these examples, the previous versions of the reference panels worked well; however, there are some limitations.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the IRUD project (Japan's Initiative on Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases 9 ) used the reference panel to reduce the discovery of false positive single nucleotide variants (SNVs) during the exome analyses of undiagnosed patients. In another project, CYP SNVs included in the reference panels were selected and analyzed systematically for their effect on drug metabolism [10][11][12] . As seen from these examples, the previous versions of the reference panels worked well; however, there are some limitations.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With other substrates, CYP2B6.4 was more active than CYP2B6.1 toward methadone (Gadel et al, 2013(Gadel et al, , 2015 and artmether (Honda et al, 2011) but less active toward cyclophosphamide (Ariyoshi et al, 2011), ifosfamide (Calinski et al, 2015), bupropion (Zhang et al, 2011), and ketamine (Wang et al, 2018). CYP2B6.6 (516G.T, 785A.G, Q172H/K262R) had lesser activity toward S-efavirenz (53% of wild-type), consistent with most (20%-50%) (Ariyoshi et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2012) but not all (Radloff et al, 2013;Watanabe et al, 2018) reports. CYP2B6.6 was also less active than CYP2B6.1 toward methadone (Gadel et al, 2013(Gadel et al, , 2015, ketamine (Wang et al, 2018), and bupropion (Zhang et al, 2011) but more active toward artmether and cyclophosphamide (Ariyoshi et al, 2011;Honda et al, 2011).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 81%
“…CYP2B6.16 and CYP2B6.18. Kinetic parameters for S-efavirenz 8-hydroxylation by CYP2B6 variants, mainly CYP2B6.1, CYP2B6.4, CYP2B6.6, and CYP2B6.9, have been reported (Table 5) (Bumpus et al, 2006;Ariyoshi et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2012;Radloff et al, 2013;Watanabe et al, 2018). CYP2B6.4 (785G.T, K262R) activity was greater than wild-type when expressed in T. ni (144%, this investigation), Sf9 cells (142%) (Ariyoshi et al, 2011), and E. coli (170%) (Bumpus et al, 2006), or similar to wild-type in E. coli (96%) (Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have now shown that in 1.5% of the observations ( N = 6 of 415), where an individual is heterozygous for both the *4 and the *9 variant, the variants are located in trans‐conformation ( CYP2B6 *4/*9). Animal and tissue studies have shown conflicting results in regard to the impact of these individual variants on enzyme function, resulting in uncertainty as to what the effect is on enzymatic function and, therefore, what phenotype should be assigned . In the DPWG guidelines, CYP2B6 *6 is designated as nonfunctional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal and tissue studies have shown conflicting results in regard to the impact of these individual variants on enzyme function, resulting in uncertainty as to what the effect is on enzymatic function and, therefore, what phenotype should be assigned. [20][21][22][23][24] In the DPWG guidelines, CYP2B6*6 is designated as nonfunctional. However, this assignment is only for the combination of the two SNVs (CYP2B6*6) and not for the individual variants (CYP2B6*4 and CYP2B6*9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%