2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional avoidance of lung in plan optimization with an aperture-based inverse planning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional planning methods have developed over time in tandem with improvements to treatment planning systems, from initial SPECT studies that used conventional plans with manually modified beam orientations [4,102,103]; to conformal (3D-CRT) planning [5,16,99,104], including a comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar fields [104]; and comparison of 3D-CRT and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) [105 107]; and a number of IMRT studies that have used between 3-10 beams [5,15,17 voxel-wise functional planning may prove a more useful option [111,115].…”
Section: Planning Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Functional planning methods have developed over time in tandem with improvements to treatment planning systems, from initial SPECT studies that used conventional plans with manually modified beam orientations [4,102,103]; to conformal (3D-CRT) planning [5,16,99,104], including a comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar fields [104]; and comparison of 3D-CRT and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) [105 107]; and a number of IMRT studies that have used between 3-10 beams [5,15,17 voxel-wise functional planning may prove a more useful option [111,115].…”
Section: Planning Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute reductions in functional V20 range from no significant difference [104,111] and 3-7% for SPECT [107,109,110,113,114]; no significant difference [16] and 4% for perfusion PET but no significant difference when using ventilation PET [15]; 2-3% for MRI [17,60,62]; and no significant difference [99 101,112] and 5% for CT-based methods [33,96,98,97] (Table 1). However, comparison between studies is complicated by the diverse methodology employed, including patient characteristics, planning techniques, segmentation and definition of functional regions, image registration and other image processing, and a lack of consistency in the use and reporting of statistical analysis.…”
Section: Planning Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations