1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00615-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional asymmetries of crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferent pathways in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a change could be associated with altered cortical activation patterns, including changes in top-down influences, as reflected in MOCB activity. Although this interpretation is highly speculative, it merits additional investigation, given the strong similarities between our findings and those of Veuillet and coworkers and the suggested link between MOCB asymmetry and cerebral speech lateralization (Philibert et al, 1998;MorandVilleneuve et al, 2005).…”
Section: Mocb and Categorical Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Such a change could be associated with altered cortical activation patterns, including changes in top-down influences, as reflected in MOCB activity. Although this interpretation is highly speculative, it merits additional investigation, given the strong similarities between our findings and those of Veuillet and coworkers and the suggested link between MOCB asymmetry and cerebral speech lateralization (Philibert et al, 1998;MorandVilleneuve et al, 2005).…”
Section: Mocb and Categorical Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is well known that the auditory system is asymmetrically organized in righthanded subjects, at both central and peripheral levels. Studies exploring the medial olivocochlear eVerent system, thought to have a protective role, have shown it to have more eVect on REs than on LEs in right-handed listeners (Khalfa and Collet, 1996;Khalfa et al, 1998;Philibert et al, 1998). DiVerences in sensitivity to tinnitus between ears were also reported, tinnitus more often aVecting LEs than REs (Axelsson and Ringdahl, 1989).…”
Section: Electrophysiological Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suppressive effect on outer hair cells improves speech-in-noise intelligibility (Giraud et al, 1997) because it enhances the dynamic range of primary auditory neurons (Micheyl and Collet, 1996;Kumar and Vanaja, 2004). The efferent effect is known to be lateralized, stronger in the right than the left ear (Khalfa et al, 1997;Philibert et al, 1998), and has accordingly been suggested to be part of the so called "right ear advantage" (Bilger et al, 1990;Kei et al, 1997;Khalfa et al, 1997;Newmark et al, 1997;Keogh et al, 2001). Noise is especially effective in eliciting this crossed efferent effect and, consequently, in the monaural speech condition with noise in the other ear, there is a systematic contralateral suppression of the neural response to the speech signal.…”
Section: Possible Influence Of Cochlear Efferents In Dichotic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%