1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1995.tb00263.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional assessment of CD2, CD3 and CD28 on the surface of peripheral blood T‐cells from infants at low versus high genetic risk for atopy

Abstract: Recent studies from several laboratories suggest that the rate of postnatal maturation of T-cell function(s) associated with in vitro activation may be slower in children at high genetic risk for atopy (HR), compared to their normal (low risk; LR) counterparts. The present study compared the in vitro activity of the function-associated surface molecules CD2, CD3 and CD28 in panels of 27 HR and 13 LR infants, with a reference panel of 10 adults, employing assay systems involving T-cell stimulation with MoAbs ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher concentration of anti‐CD3 required for maximal proliferation in 18‐month‐old children, as compared to adults, is in agreement with previous studies in 6‐month‐old infants ( 8) and newborns ( 33). Similarly, the more rapid decline with anti‐CD3 dilution in atopic children supports the previous findings of a reduced anti‐CD3 responsiveness in infants with atopic heredity ( 8). Moreover, recent data from our group show that during the first 18 months of life, children with a double atopic heredity have a slower post‐natal rise of CD3 MFI than children with no or single atopic heredity ( 34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher concentration of anti‐CD3 required for maximal proliferation in 18‐month‐old children, as compared to adults, is in agreement with previous studies in 6‐month‐old infants ( 8) and newborns ( 33). Similarly, the more rapid decline with anti‐CD3 dilution in atopic children supports the previous findings of a reduced anti‐CD3 responsiveness in infants with atopic heredity ( 8). Moreover, recent data from our group show that during the first 18 months of life, children with a double atopic heredity have a slower post‐natal rise of CD3 MFI than children with no or single atopic heredity ( 34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Based on T‐cell studies (reviewed in 7), e.g. assessment of sheep erythrocyte rosette‐forming T‐cell numbers, phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) responsiveness, interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) production, and anti‐CD3 responsiveness in infants with atopic heredity ( 8), it has been hypothesized that atopic children show a delayed immunological maturation after birth. CD2, the receptor for sheep erythrocytes, enhances the interaction between the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and the T‐cell receptor via binding to leukocyte function‐associated antigen‐3 (LFA‐3) on the antigen‐presenting cell ( 9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate a delayed upregulation of the CD3 receptor in children with an atopic family history. The findings were subtle, but they are supported by observations that T–cells from infants with a family history of allergy required higher levels of anti–CD3 stimulation to reach maximum responses than adults, while low–risk infants did not differ from adults [12]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In human, the incidence of type 1 diabetes has increased during the past several decades in developed countries where environmental conditions have dramatically changed [128–131]. This hypothesis suggests that bacterial antigens would be presented by the innate immune system to the T lymphocytes very early in life supporting the notion that immunostimulation can benefit the maturation of the postnatal immune system [132, 133]. Consequently, in case of misrecognition of the bacterial antigen, the adaptive immune system will be exacerbating its aggressiveness against the pancreatic cells and destroy them.…”
Section: Gut Microbiota and Type 1 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%