2016
DOI: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance

Abstract: Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) are genetic variants whose association with a disease phenotype has not been established. They are a common finding in sequencing-based genetic tests and pose a significant clinical challenge. The objective of this study was to assess the use of functional data to classify variants according to pathogenicity. We conduct functional analysis of a large set of BRCA1 VUS combining a validated functional assay with VarCall, a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the likel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following analysis, we adopted the Bayes factor (BF) as the strength of evidence in favor of pathogenicity. To calculate the BF, we utilized a Bayesian hierarchical two-component Gaussian mixture model based on the VarCall model 18,31,32 with a noninformative prior probability. In this setting, the BFs were calculated as the probability ratio of a variant being deleterious to it being neutral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following analysis, we adopted the Bayes factor (BF) as the strength of evidence in favor of pathogenicity. To calculate the BF, we utilized a Bayesian hierarchical two-component Gaussian mixture model based on the VarCall model 18,31,32 with a noninformative prior probability. In this setting, the BFs were calculated as the probability ratio of a variant being deleterious to it being neutral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar dilemma is faced in annotation of BRCA2 (MIM: 600185) variants in which a probability threshold and annotation for deleterious variants associated with only moderate risk for cancer have yet to be determined. 58 The ongoing challenge of annotation of variants with moderate functional effects lends itself well to the incorporation of quantitative functional results and their associated endophenotypes (continuous-valued quantitative traits) 59 into a variant classification scheme.…”
Section: Variant Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay was further validated by the functional impact of known cancer-associated variants and BRCA1 TA. Over the last 15 years, more than 300 variants enclosed within the 1396-1863 amino acid residues (all known missense variants in the C-terminal region of the BRCA1) were evaluated [57,58]. By comparing the results of BRCA1 TA with a reference panel of 49 missense variants classified by multifactorial models, using a Bayesian hierarchical model (VarCall) to predict the likelihood of pathogenicity, we observed a 1.0 sensitivity and 1.0 specificity (lower bound of 95% confidence interval = 0.78 and 0.84, respectively), demonstrating that this approach can classify VUS with confidence [57].…”
Section: Functional Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%