2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22100-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional annotations of three domestic animal genomes provide vital resources for comparative and agricultural research

Abstract: Gene regulatory elements are central drivers of phenotypic variation and thus of critical importance towards understanding the genetics of complex traits. The Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes consortium was formed to collaboratively annotate the functional elements in animal genomes, starting with domesticated animals. Here we present an expansive collection of datasets from eight diverse tissues in three important agricultural species: chicken (Gallus gallus), pig (Sus scrofa), and cattle (Bos taurus).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
180
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
10
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomic selection will be more accurate over time and across breeds if causal variants are included in predictive modelling ( MacLeod et al, 2016 ). It is thought that causal variants are found in functional regions of the genome but until recently ( Villar et al, 2015 ; Fang et al, 2019 ; Kern et al, 2021 ) these were not well annotated in cattle ( Koufariotis et al, 2014 ; Nguyen et al, 2018 ). This study annotated functional regions in six tissues in 2–3 Holstein dairy cows using ChIP-seq for four histone modifications and one transcription factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genomic selection will be more accurate over time and across breeds if causal variants are included in predictive modelling ( MacLeod et al, 2016 ). It is thought that causal variants are found in functional regions of the genome but until recently ( Villar et al, 2015 ; Fang et al, 2019 ; Kern et al, 2021 ) these were not well annotated in cattle ( Koufariotis et al, 2014 ; Nguyen et al, 2018 ). This study annotated functional regions in six tissues in 2–3 Holstein dairy cows using ChIP-seq for four histone modifications and one transcription factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional regions have been identified in the bovine genome in liver ( Villar et al, 2015 ), rumen epithelial cells ( Fang et al, 2019 ) and other tissues ( Kern et al, 2021 ). However, functional regions can vary between tissues ( Kellis et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Halstead et al (2020), which provided one of the first epigenomic resources for livestock study, identified only around 300 000 regulatory elements in each of the study species, cattle and pig. Similarly, Kern et al (2021) identified ~65 000, ~140 000 and ~150 000 active regulatory regions in chicken, pig and cattle, respectively. Nonetheless, these identified regulatory elements when analysed with a gene expression atlas, GWAS and selection signatures for the species such as that available in cattle (Fang et al 2020;Liu et al 2020) provides a more complete picture of the link between gene regulation and traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The ATAC-seq assay on these eight tissues from pig and cattle was performed to analyze chromatin accessibility conservation across mammals ( Halstead et al, 2020 ). Furthermore, ChIP-seq (four histone modification marks and CTCF) assays across three species and DNase-seq in chickens were performed to annotate dynamic chromatin states across tissues and species ( Kern et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Use Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%