2017
DOI: 10.1101/112557
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Annotation of Chemical Libraries across Diverse Biological Processes

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutant‐specific barcodes were amplified using indexed primers. Samples were sequenced on a HiSeq2500 (1 × 50 bp) (Illumina, San Diego CA, USA) rapid run and reads were processed using BEAN‐counter (Piotrowski et al ., ) and EdgeR (Robinson et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutant‐specific barcodes were amplified using indexed primers. Samples were sequenced on a HiSeq2500 (1 × 50 bp) (Illumina, San Diego CA, USA) rapid run and reads were processed using BEAN‐counter (Piotrowski et al ., ) and EdgeR (Robinson et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we screened more than 13,000 compounds across 5 different compound collections using this optimized screening approach enabled by COMPRESS-GI [35]. We were able to make high-confidence mode-of-action predictions for the targeted bioprocess through comparison to genetic interaction profiles for a total of more than 1500 compounds [35, 36], supporting the utility of compressed mutant profiles for functional characterization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In total, we screened more than 13,000 compounds across 5 different compound collections using this optimized screening approach enabled by COMPRESS-GI [35]. We were able to make high-confidence mode-of-action predictions for the targeted bioprocess through comparison to genetic interaction profiles for a total of more than 1500 compounds [35, 36], supporting the utility of compressed mutant profiles for functional characterization. The predicted modes of action spanned a diverse set of functional categories (Fig 6d), and we collected additional phenotypic data supporting our predictions for novel compounds in several different classes including tubulin inhibitors, cell cycle, and cell wall targeting compounds [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C hemical-genetic interaction profiling in model organisms, such as yeast, has emerged as a powerful strategy to reveal functional insights into compounds, genes, and cellular processes. In these studies, the mechanism of action of a compound can be deduced by comparing its chemical-genetic interaction profile (the quantitative landscape of the effects of a panel of individual genes on the efficacy of this particular compound) to the profiles of compounds with known cellular targets to identify the most similar profiles [1][2][3][4][5] . Likewise, the function of a gene can be inferred by comparing its chemical-genetic interaction profile (the quantitative landscape of the effects of this particular gene on the efficacy of a panel of compounds) to the profiles of genes with known functions 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%