2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and structural properties of human patellar articular cartilage in osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared the femoral condyle cartilage FRPE parameters to other locations in the knee 9,39 and hip 36 joints (Figure 3). In normal femoral condyle cartilage, the initial permeability and permeability strain-dependency coefficient were 5.64 (95% CI 2.72, 8.53) 9 10 215 m 4 N 21 s 21 and 7.71 (95% CI 3.39, 12.01) greater compared to those in the tibial plateau cartilage respectively, while the strain-dependent fibril network modulus of femoral condyle cartilage was 11.64 (95% CI 3.61, 19.67) MPa smaller compared to those in the tibial plateau cartilage (Supplementary Material Table S3).…”
Section: Constituent-specific Fibril-reinforced Poroelasticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compared the femoral condyle cartilage FRPE parameters to other locations in the knee 9,39 and hip 36 joints (Figure 3). In normal femoral condyle cartilage, the initial permeability and permeability strain-dependency coefficient were 5.64 (95% CI 2.72, 8.53) 9 10 215 m 4 N 21 s 21 and 7.71 (95% CI 3.39, 12.01) greater compared to those in the tibial plateau cartilage respectively, while the strain-dependent fibril network modulus of femoral condyle cartilage was 11.64 (95% CI 3.61, 19.67) MPa smaller compared to those in the tibial plateau cartilage (Supplementary Material Table S3).…”
Section: Constituent-specific Fibril-reinforced Poroelasticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also acknowledge that the samples that are harvested from different donors with different gender, age and OA subtypes might affect the validity of the comparison of mechanical properties between human femoral cartilage (this study) and other cartilage sites, 9,39 and thus, the conclusion made based on these comparisons may not be necessarily generalized.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be related to their differences in terms of cartilage thickness, composition, compressive properties, and permeability. In particular, the thickness of patellar cartilage could determine the fragility of this chondral site with the consequent limited cartilage regeneration after scaffold implantations, plausibly explaining the lower clinical outcomes observed [9, 16]. Based on these results, when evaluating the outcome of cartilage treatments in the patello‐femoral joint, the patellar and trochlear defects should be considered as separate entity, and a specific focus should be put on patellar results, which proved to be particularly challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding studies performed on human tissue, the structure-function relationships of healthy and diseased tissue have been studied only in tibial 15 , patellar 38 and hip joint 34 cartilage. Nevertheless, structure-function relationships of human femoral condyle cartilage are still not well explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%