2008
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and computational studies of the ligand‐associated metal binding site of β3 integrins

Abstract: A combination of experimental and computational approaches was used to provide a structural context for the role of the beta3 integrin subunit ligand-associated metal binding site (LIMBS) in the binding of physiological ligands to beta3 integrins. Specifically, we have carried out (1) adhesion assays on cells expressing normal alphaIIbeta3, normal alphaVbeta3, or the corresponding beta3 D217A LIMBS mutants; and (2) equilibrium and nonequilibrium (steered) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of eptifibatide in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…126 Molecular dynamic simulations of select groups of atoms in the ligand binding regions of ␣IIb␤3 and ␣V␤3 have been performed in an attempt to understand the allosteric pathways leading to activation and the energetics of ligand binding. [127][128][129] These computation-intensive studies have been made possible by advances in the application of biophysical and thermodynamic principles to biologic systems and the availability of more powerful computers. The results have provided models of variations in regional flexibility and interactions with water molecules over time, the force needed to remove ligands from the binding pocket under different conditions, and the allosteric pathways leading from one conformation to another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126 Molecular dynamic simulations of select groups of atoms in the ligand binding regions of ␣IIb␤3 and ␣V␤3 have been performed in an attempt to understand the allosteric pathways leading to activation and the energetics of ligand binding. [127][128][129] These computation-intensive studies have been made possible by advances in the application of biophysical and thermodynamic principles to biologic systems and the availability of more powerful computers. The results have provided models of variations in regional flexibility and interactions with water molecules over time, the force needed to remove ligands from the binding pocket under different conditions, and the allosteric pathways leading from one conformation to another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biochemical and molecular abnormalities in GT have been studied for nearly 40 y (4,6,(8)(9)(10). In the past 10 y, high-resolution crystallography, electron microscopy, and computational studies of the αIIbβ3 receptor have provided atomic-level information on the correlation between receptor structure and function (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). In addition, ethnic groups with relatively high prevalence of GT have been defined that share the same genetic abnormality based on founder mutations, and the dates that some of the mutations entered the population have been estimated (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, 3D molecular models have been built based on crystallographic and NMR data to analyze the effects of novel amino acid substitutions on receptor structure and function and the generation of alloantigens (15,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53). The data from these models and assessments of the severity of the amino acid change in the variants have the potential to aid in predicting whether a novel variant is likely to affect receptor function and immunogenicity (54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of non-equilibrium processes such as SMD simulations, the binding free energy profiles (referred to as potential of mean force: PMF) can be calculated by Jarzynski equality [24,25]. Many researchers have also reported that SMD simulations identified the dynamic processes of protein-ligand binding and unbinding [20,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. We analyzed PMFs and SMD structures, and compared them among four combinations of antibody/antigen: W/FLU(À1), W/FLU(À2), M/FLU(À1) and M/FLU(À2), where characters W and M represent the wild-type and the mutant, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%