2006
DOI: 10.1002/masy.200651214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and Comfort Properties of Textiles from TENCEL® Fibres Resulting from the Fibres' Water‐Absorbing Nanostructure: A Review

Abstract: The comfort in wear of textiles has been studied extensively on the level of textile construction. The influence of the fibre material is present in the experience of textile consumers, but objective assessment is rather difficult. Some recent works are reviewed here. TENCEL 1 is a man-made cellulosic fibre of the generic fibre type lyocell. The background of the special comfort in wear of textiles made from TENCEL 1 fibres is explained as a consequence of the fibres' water-absorbing nanostructure. The basis f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates the greatest change of this material in terms of absorption properties after 10 cycles. This change can be explained by well-known fact that Tencel® absorb water through fibre, while cotton fibre absorb water only on surface [5]. By further subjecting fabrics to washing and sterilization cycles, there is no significant difference in the absorption rate, with total increase after 50 cycles compared to the initial (0 cycle) sample of only 4 % (total 94 %).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates the greatest change of this material in terms of absorption properties after 10 cycles. This change can be explained by well-known fact that Tencel® absorb water through fibre, while cotton fibre absorb water only on surface [5]. By further subjecting fabrics to washing and sterilization cycles, there is no significant difference in the absorption rate, with total increase after 50 cycles compared to the initial (0 cycle) sample of only 4 % (total 94 %).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While cotton, which is most often used for underwear, keeps most of the water at fibre surface, and is thus more susceptible to develop microorganisms, Tencel® is different and is being increasingly used in medicine and postoperative situations on the expense of cotton and other materials. Tencel® does not let off particles (textile dust) as opposed to cotton, which is prone to such shedding and is for this reason being removed from medical applications [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high absorption capacity provides the necessary comfort. An even greater advantage is given to Tencel® from a medical aspect because it does not release particles or produces textile dust [12,13]. PES/PU/PES three-layered textile laminate meets the European standards for surgical textiles EN 13795; it is impermeable to all liquids, viruses and also meets dry and wet microbiological tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make it less likely that swollen SAP particles can seal the passages adjacent to a cellulosic fiber, one could select fibers having an irregular cross-section (Pramanick and Crouse 1998). For instance, certain viscose fibers have been observed to be multi-lobal in cross-section (Schuster et al 2006). The use of twisted, curly fibers for absorbent products has been patented (Sun and Lindsay 2003;Hu and Ko 2006).…”
Section: Channelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of chemically pulped fibers, effects related to porosity also extend to the nano-scale. A mesoporous structure within various kinds of cellulose material has been well documented (Stone and Scallan 1968;Schuster et al 2006). Also, it has been proposed that grafting of such fibers with hydrophilic polymer chains may serve to brace adjacent microfibrils apart from each other, thus contributing to the swellability and ultimately to the volume available for sorption of fluids (Lepoutre et al 1973).…”
Section: Pore Structurementioning
confidence: 99%