2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-005-1146-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional analysis of the GAF domain of NifA in Azospirillum brasilense: effects of Tyr→Phe mutations on NifA and its interaction with GlnB

Abstract: Regulation of NifA activity in Azospirillum brasilense depends on GlnB (a PII protein), and it was previously reported that the target of GlnB activity is the N-terminal domain of NifA. Furthermore, mutation of the Tyr residue at position 18 in the N-terminal domain resulted in a NifA protein that did not require GlnB for activity under nitrogen fixation conditions. We report here that a NifA double mutant in which the Tyr residues at positions 18 and 53 of NifA N-were simultaneously replaced by Phe (NifA-Y185… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the previous results determined in A. brasilense that the double mutant protein NifA-Y18/53F displayed a higher activity than the wild type protein [12] . Surprisingly, the most strengthened GlnB signal is in the elution fraction from cells expressing His6-NifA-N-Y18F.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the previous results determined in A. brasilense that the double mutant protein NifA-Y18/53F displayed a higher activity than the wild type protein [12] . Surprisingly, the most strengthened GlnB signal is in the elution fraction from cells expressing His6-NifA-N-Y18F.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Replacement of the Tyr residues at positions 18, 43 and 53 in A. brasilense NifA N-terminal domain resulted in NifA proteins that retained high nitrogenase activity in both nifA and glnB mutant backgrounds [12] . However, whether GlnB regulates NifA activity by directly interaction with N-terminal of NifA (abbreviated to NifA-N) or by covalent modification of NifA is still unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been successfully used to explore binding between several components of the ntr and nif regulatory systems (Lei et al, 1999;Martínez-Argudo et al, 2002;Rudnick et al, 2002;Pawlowski et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2005). Thus, a direct protein-protein binding was detected between NifA and NifL in K. pneumoniae, Azotobacter vinelandii and Enterobacter cloacae (Lei et al, 1999;Martínez-Argudo et al, 2002;Liao et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some organisms, for example, A. brasilense, Herbaspirillum seropedicae, and Rhodospirillum rubrum, the uridylylated form of the P II protein is apparently required to prevent intramolecular repression of NifA activity by the GAF domain under nitrogen-limiting conditions (71)(72)(73). In contrast, in Rhodobacter capsulatus and Azorhizobium caulinodans, P II proteins are required to inactivate NifA under conditions of nitrogen excess (74,75).…”
Section: The P II Protein Familymentioning
confidence: 99%