1998
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional analysis of peptide motif for RNA microhelix binding suggests new family of RNA-binding domains

Abstract: RNA microhelices that recreate the acceptor stems of transfer RNAs are charged with specific amino acids. Here we identify a two-helix pair in alanyl-tRNA synthetase that is required for RNA microhelix binding. A single point mutation at an absolutely conserved residue in this motif selectively disrupts RNA binding without perturbation of the catalytic site. These results, and findings of similar motifs in the proximity of the active sites of other tRNA synthetases, suggest that two-helix pairs are widespread … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, the results of the steady-state and single-turnover kinetic analyses suggest that the hDRS extension likely interacts with tRNA or the active site in a manner that may provide additional understanding of the process of synthetase⅐RNA interactions. Furthermore, in contrast to the lysine-rich extensions described in several recent reports (10,26,27), the 32-residue extension in hDRS is short and is not highly basic. In this paper, we focus on the tRNA binding by the amino-terminal extension in hDRS using fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD).…”
contrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Altogether, the results of the steady-state and single-turnover kinetic analyses suggest that the hDRS extension likely interacts with tRNA or the active site in a manner that may provide additional understanding of the process of synthetase⅐RNA interactions. Furthermore, in contrast to the lysine-rich extensions described in several recent reports (10,26,27), the 32-residue extension in hDRS is short and is not highly basic. In this paper, we focus on the tRNA binding by the amino-terminal extension in hDRS using fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD).…”
contrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The A76 residues in the first and second models are highlighted in yellow and blue, respectively. Amino acid residues important for the aminoacylation or editing activity (17,28,38,39,45,46) are shown as stick models. Ala-SA in the aminoacylation site and the editing-site zinc ion are depicted as cpk models.…”
Section: Position Of the Editing Domain The Editing Domain Of A Fulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the bacterial AlaRSs might have the editing domain in a different location from that in the archaeal AlaRS, relative to the aminoacylation/tRNA-recognition domains, thus allowing the tRNA to shift easily between the 2 active sites. In E. coli AlaRS, the aminoacylation/tRNA-recognition domains and the editing domain are both able to recognize the G3⅐U70 base pair in the tRNA acceptor stem (17), involving Arg-314 on the tRNArecognition domain and Arg-693 on the editing domain of E. coli AlaRS (17,39). Intriguingly, in the present A. fulgidus AlaRS structure, Arg-371 (Mid1) and Arg-731, which correspond to the G3⅐U70 recognition residues Arg-314 and Arg-693, respectively, are close to the putative tRNA binding site in the alternative groove (Fig.…”
Section: Position Of the Editing Domain The Editing Domain Of A Fulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity for G:U versus U:G at the 3:70 position of microhelix Ala was reduced Ϸ5-fold for 368N-MF␤25 relative to the free MF␤2 peptide. This reduction probably reflects the serendipitous weak nonspecific RNA-binding determinants in fragment 368N that affect the context for RNA binding by the fusion peptide (35). Further selections could be placed on the fusion proteins to ameliorate these effects.…”
Section: Mutational Analysis Of Fusion Peptidementioning
confidence: 99%