2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01350-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Analysis of Family GH36 α-Galactosidases from Ruminococcus gnavus E1: Insights into the Metabolism of a Plant Oligosaccharide by a Human Gut Symbiont

Abstract: dRuminococcus gnavus belongs to the 57 most common species present in 90% of individuals. Previously, we identified an ␣-galactosidase (Aga1) belonging to glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 36 from R. gnavus E1 (M. Aguilera, H. Rakotoarivonina, A. Brutus, T. Giardina, G. Simon, and M. Fons, Res. Microbiol. 163:14 -21, 2012). Here, we identified a novel GH36-encoding gene from the same strain and termed it aga2. Although aga1 showed a very simple genetic organization, aga2 is part of an operon of unique structure,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Both strains possess similar number of GH13 enzymes while the E1 strain has a higher number of GH1, GH2 and GH3, thus, together with a higher number of GH36 (α-galactosidase), GH78 (rhamnosidase), GH43 (xylosidase/arabinosidase), GH29 and GH95 (α-fucosidases), and strain-specific GH63 (α-glucosidase), GH16 (β-glucanase), GH91 (inulin fructotransferase), the E1 strain seems to be more adapted to the degradation of a diversified array of dietary carbohydrate-based substrates [42]. In contrast, the R. gnavus ATCC 29149 genome encodes less GHs than E1 but with a higher proportion of enzymes putatively implicated in degradation of host-derived oligosaccharides, including predicted GH33 sialidase and GH98 endo-β-galactosidase, which are absent in the R. gnavus E1 genome, and both predicted to be extracellular.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Both strains possess similar number of GH13 enzymes while the E1 strain has a higher number of GH1, GH2 and GH3, thus, together with a higher number of GH36 (α-galactosidase), GH78 (rhamnosidase), GH43 (xylosidase/arabinosidase), GH29 and GH95 (α-fucosidases), and strain-specific GH63 (α-glucosidase), GH16 (β-glucanase), GH91 (inulin fructotransferase), the E1 strain seems to be more adapted to the degradation of a diversified array of dietary carbohydrate-based substrates [42]. In contrast, the R. gnavus ATCC 29149 genome encodes less GHs than E1 but with a higher proportion of enzymes putatively implicated in degradation of host-derived oligosaccharides, including predicted GH33 sialidase and GH98 endo-β-galactosidase, which are absent in the R. gnavus E1 genome, and both predicted to be extracellular.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. gnavus plays a pivotal role in UDCA formation in the colon, which regarded as a supplement of the bile acid (Lee et al, 2013). A recent study found that the α-galactosidase 1 (Aga1) and α-galactosidase 2 (Aga2) which are two kinds of the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family from R. gnavus played an indispensable role in the degradation of dietary oligosaccharides and exerted a tremendous fascination on designing of galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS) prebiotics (Cervera-Tison et al, 2012). The studies in human and rat found that R. gnavus was enriched in the obese rats and humans (Petriz et al, 2014; Andoh et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. gnavus produces the bacteriocin ruminococcin A, which inhibits the growth of phylogenetically-related species and various bifidobacterial and clostridial species[32]. Ruminococcin A also degrades intestinal mucin[33] and induced α-galactosidase and β-glucuronidase activity in vitro [34]. β-glucuronidase activity generates toxic metabolites in the colon, which provoke local inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%