2001
DOI: 10.1080/00039890109604064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function Testing for Chemical Brain Damage: A Review

Abstract: Testing of neurobehavioral functions for evaluation of the effects of chemicals on the human brain from community (i.e., environmental) exposures is logical and may be a preferred initial step. Sensitivity is improved (1) by adjusting individual tests for influential factors, found by regression modeling and by retaining significant coefficients; and (2) by the calculation of predicted values for each test for each subject. This two-part approach allows for adjustments in age, sex, educational level, and other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive measures included the Dementia Rating Scale-2 (Jurica et al 2001), a measure of global cognitive functioning; the Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (Wilkinson 1993), a measure of premorbid intelligence; the logical memory subtest of the WMS-3 (Wechsler 1997a); and a measure of moment-to-moment cognitive processing sensitive to mild brain dysfunction, the Digit Symbol coding test (Wechsler 1997b; Anger et al 2000; Kilburn 2001; Lopez et al 2003). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive measures included the Dementia Rating Scale-2 (Jurica et al 2001), a measure of global cognitive functioning; the Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (Wilkinson 1993), a measure of premorbid intelligence; the logical memory subtest of the WMS-3 (Wechsler 1997a); and a measure of moment-to-moment cognitive processing sensitive to mild brain dysfunction, the Digit Symbol coding test (Wechsler 1997b; Anger et al 2000; Kilburn 2001; Lopez et al 2003). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors of experimental studies in animals [17][18][19] and/or case reports or community surveys in humans 20 21 61 have interpreted their findings to be consistent with a neurological effect from low level H 2 S exposure. There have also been reports that repeated or prolonged ''knockdowns'' (that is, loss of consciousness) from high level H 2 S exposure result in prolonged adverse neurological effects, [62][63][64] although evidence in this area remains highly controversial.…”
Section: Transportation Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we assessed risk of death for neurological disorders, accidental falls, transportation accidents (with passengers removed from the analysis to the extent possible based on ICD codes), and suicide based on suggestions from several authors that low level, chronic exposure to H 2 S may impair neuropsychological function. [17][18][19][20][21] The results shown in table 10 indicate that deaths due to respiratory disease were non-significantly increased in the two exposure groups where the RR could be calculated, but these findings were based on small numbers. Suicide showed no relation to cumulative H 2 S exposure.…”
Section: Hydrogen Sulphidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, long-term effects of occupational exposure to low levels of the gas have not been studied enough. However, (Kilburn, 2001) reported that longterm exposure to low concentrations of H 2 S is associated with neuropsychiatric and cognitive dysfunction manifestations, including: fatigue, loss of appetite, irritability, impaired memory, altered mood states, headache, and dizziness. However, it is not known if these effects are the result of chronic exposure or due to reoccurring acute exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%