1990
DOI: 10.1109/32.44364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function points in the estimation and evaluation of the software process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure is not without its flaws, but it is the most common measure of size and complexity in software engineering (Boehm 1981;Scacchi 1995). Many of the traditional drawbacks of KLOC -such as defining what qualifies as a line of code and how to count thousands of lines of code -are mitigated in our case, as we consider only one organization that uses a consistent counting methodology (Jones 1986;Low and Jeffery 1990). Software development has been shown to exhibit scale effects, so we use the logarithm of KLOC (Banker and Kemerer 1989).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is not without its flaws, but it is the most common measure of size and complexity in software engineering (Boehm 1981;Scacchi 1995). Many of the traditional drawbacks of KLOC -such as defining what qualifies as a line of code and how to count thousands of lines of code -are mitigated in our case, as we consider only one organization that uses a consistent counting methodology (Jones 1986;Low and Jeffery 1990). Software development has been shown to exhibit scale effects, so we use the logarithm of KLOC (Banker and Kemerer 1989).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional work in defining standards has been done by Zwanzig (Zwanzig 1984) and Desharnais (Desharnais 1988 (Boehm 1981) (Jones 1986 (Rudolph 1983, p. 6) Aside from this description, the only other research documented study is by Low and Jeffery (Low and Jeffery 1990). Their research focused on the inter-rater reliability of FP counts using as their research methodology an experiment using professional systems developers as subjects, with the unit of analysis being a set of program level specifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In planning, the task of estimating the final SLOC count for a proposed system has been shown to be difficult to do accurately in actual practice (Low and Jeffery 1990). And in control, SLOC measures for evaluating productivity have weaknesses as well, in particular, the problem of comparing systems written in different languages (Jones 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 는 언어에 종속되어 있다 [9]. QSM [24] David [25] Jones [27] Mcgilbon [28] Sifri [29] 4GL(44) Access/Access 8.0(43) Ada/Ada 95(3)…”
Section:  기반 소프트웨어 공식과 문제점unclassified