2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function of C-terminal hydrophobic region in fructose dehydrogenase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the stability and lifetime of the FDH/2-ANT/SWCNT/GCE has been evaluated by monitoring the amperometric signal decrease over 60 days (Figure B), showing 90% retainment of the initial signal. which is ascribable to the correct orientation of FDH onto the electrode surface and the strength of the π–π interaction between the anthracenyl groups and the aromatic groups in the side chain of the amino acids present in the hydrophobic region, as was previously also shown for laccase …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the stability and lifetime of the FDH/2-ANT/SWCNT/GCE has been evaluated by monitoring the amperometric signal decrease over 60 days (Figure B), showing 90% retainment of the initial signal. which is ascribable to the correct orientation of FDH onto the electrode surface and the strength of the π–π interaction between the anthracenyl groups and the aromatic groups in the side chain of the amino acids present in the hydrophobic region, as was previously also shown for laccase …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the overall electrocatalytic wave, it is possible to clearly see that it is divided into three parts: (i) the first sigmoidal catalytic wave starting in correspondence to heme c 1 of FDH (−0.1 V to +0.050 V), (ii) the second sigmoidal catalytic wave starting in correspondence to heme c 2 of FDH not visible in the non-turnover signal (+0.050 to +0.250 V), and (iii) the mass-transfer-limited current due to the limited diffusion of the substrate to the electrode (+0.250 to +0.550 V). This result could be explained by the enhanced roughness of the electrode surface improving the enzyme loading and the correct orientation of FDH due to the interaction between the anthracenyl group and the hydrophobic part of subunit II. In particular, the interaction occurs between the aromatic rings of the anthracenyl group and the aromatic rings available on the side chain of the amino acids present in the hydrophobic portion of subunit II (π–π interaction) …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the flavocytochrome oxidoreductases, the DET mechanism for membrane bound FDH has not yet been elucidated [ 45 ] and therefore FDH has attracted a growing interest also regarding all factors that can influence the DET reaction (e.g., pH, cations, ionic strength, etc.) [ 46 – 48 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KCl) was suggested as a bridge between FAD and heme 2c in the IET process (Figure 4) [30]. In addition, the catalytic current density of FDH was dramatically increased by deleting the amino acid residues on the N-or C-terminus of subunit II [30,105,106]. The deletion not only promotes enzyme loading but also provides more opportunities for favorable orientations on the electrode surface.…”
Section: Fructose Dehydrogenasementioning
confidence: 99%