1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb50429.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Function and Evolution of Neurofilament Proteinsa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several factors that could contribute to differential changes in members of the marker panel, including differences in their brain regional, cellular, and subcellular localizations, as well as possible different rates of turnover in the lumbar CSF. For example, phosphorylated NFH is localized primarily in axons (Jung et al, 2000), where it is part of the cytoskeleton (Sternberger et al, 1982;Lasek et al, 1985), whereas 14-3-3 βand ζ are cytoplasmic proteins concentrated in perikarya (Martin et al, 1994;Aitken et al, 2003). The five proteins are also differentially expressed across the neuraxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several factors that could contribute to differential changes in members of the marker panel, including differences in their brain regional, cellular, and subcellular localizations, as well as possible different rates of turnover in the lumbar CSF. For example, phosphorylated NFH is localized primarily in axons (Jung et al, 2000), where it is part of the cytoskeleton (Sternberger et al, 1982;Lasek et al, 1985), whereas 14-3-3 βand ζ are cytoplasmic proteins concentrated in perikarya (Martin et al, 1994;Aitken et al, 2003). The five proteins are also differentially expressed across the neuraxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The validity of this approach was established by immunodetection of released proteins in CSF following experimental traumatic brain injury or transient global forebrain ischemia 2005). Several of these are expressed predominantly or exclusively in neurons, including the β and ζ isoforms of 14-3-3 (Aitken et al, 2003), a hypophosphorylated form of the neurofilament triplet polypeptide NFH (pNFH; Lasek et al, 1985;Jung et al, 2000), and the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH-L1 (Doran et al, 1983). Others are proteolytic fragments of abundant neuronal proteins, including an α-spectrin breakdown product generated by calpain, a family of calcium-dependent proteases associated with neuronal necrosis (Siman et al, 1989;Roberts-Lewis et al, 1993;Zhang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reinforces the conclusion, based on the identification of cell lines without cIFs and the results of experimental studies (see below) that cIFs are not an indispensible feature of eukaryotic cells. On the other hand, cIFs have been found in essentially all the major multicellular eukaryotic phyla (Table I) [see Lasek et al, 1985;Traub, 1985;Biessman and Walter, 19891, and similarly sized cytoplasmic filaments, distinct from microfilaments and microtubules, have been identified in a number of protists [see Grain, 1986, for review]. For example, cytoplasmic filaments presumed to be related to vertebrate cIFs have been found associated with the oral apparatus of the ciliated protist Tetruhymenu [Numata et al, 19831. Proteins that cross react immunologically with the cIF subunit proteins of vertebrates have been found associated with microtubules in higher plant cells [Dawson et al, 1985;Hargreaves et al, 1989a,b].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Distribution Of If Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because mRNA transcripts in general lack promoter sequences, the integration of an intronless cDNA molecule into the host chromosome usually results in the generation of a nontranscribed processed pseudogene that, with the passage of time, acquires mutations and thereby loses homology with its parental transcribed sequence (19 (Fig. 4), the time at which this event might have occurred is sufficiently distant (at least 600 million years ago, based on its presence in vertebrates, annelids, and molluscs [18]) so that all traces of the molecular event [flanking direct repeats and a poly(A) tract] would have been obliterated by neutral drift. In addition, the original intronless sequence would have had to acquire three new introns, presumably by insertional transposition, subsequent to its own creation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%