2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0947-3580(05)71042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fun-to-Drive by Feedback*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this phase, the amplification torque decreases, until reaching the lower saturation values. In literature, we can find many stationary models for the EPS system ( [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]), where the hysteresis cycle is approximated by a single curve. Nevertheless, these investigations do not provide ground foundations (other than these curves reproduce the behaviour of the older power steering systems, based on hydraulic valves), neither evidence that they are optimal for the driver in any sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this phase, the amplification torque decreases, until reaching the lower saturation values. In literature, we can find many stationary models for the EPS system ( [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]), where the hysteresis cycle is approximated by a single curve. Nevertheless, these investigations do not provide ground foundations (other than these curves reproduce the behaviour of the older power steering systems, based on hydraulic valves), neither evidence that they are optimal for the driver in any sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, do not have well defined design measures such as tracking error signals. On the other hand, performance criteria such as "comfort" and "feel" are subjective in nature [3,17]. Furthermore, such criteria are difficult to quantify using physical measurements available during normal operation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the choice of the robust multi-objective H2/H∞ performance [18] is motivated by the desire to enforce closed loop time-domain specifications in the L2-sense by means of the implicit model following (IMF) [12], and disturbance attenuation within the H∞ framework. This model following approach provides a natural setting to address the subjectivity involved by treating the difference between desired and actual dynamics as a design objective [3,12]. Furthermore, unlike model-matching based on the Youla-parametrization approach, the IMF does not require additional states in the feedback system, leaving fixed-structure controllers unaltered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When applying these solutions on an actual car one of the major hurdles to face is the integration of the driver's wish in the controller [2]. Traditionally this is archived employing look-up tables driven by the throttle pedal position specifying a reference value for the engine and clutch torque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%