Fumigene: a model to study the impact of management rules and constraints on agricultural waste allocation at the farm level

Abstract

SUMMARYIn France, many dairy farms plan the allocation of animal wastes to the fields of the farm at the beginning of every year. This decision is complex, because many factors must be taken into account at the field and farm scales, including increasingly constraining environmental regulations. To evaluate the environmental impact of waste allocation strategies, these strategies have to be translated into consistent decisions. The objective of the current study was to reproduce the decisions made by farmers, in a wide range of contexts. For this purpose, a linear programming model that could help in generating yearly waste allocations was developed. The model, called Fumigene, takes into account the farmer's preferences and environmental, agronomic and feasibility constraints. It was applied on two case farms and the simulated waste allocations were compared to those chosen by the farmers over periods of 3 and 4 years, respectively. The evaluation showed that the waste allocations generated by the model were consistent with the strategies of the farmers. Fumigene was then used in investigating the impact of taking into account the phosphorus (P) fertilization constraints instead of only the nitrogen constraints. In the case studied, balancing P fertilization over 5 years led to small changes in waste allocation. Balancing P fertilization every year caused bigger changes and led to export of a part of the wastes. In a general way, Fumigene can be coupled with environmental evaluation tools to compare the impacts of different waste allocation strategies.

To what extent is climate change adaptation a novel challenge for agricultural modellers?

“…At farm-scale, eliciting farmers’ objectives is not straightforward; what they say and what they do may not be the same (Mandryk et al, 2014). Rather than using expert judgement to validate the performance of decision making sub-models, models such as MELODIE (Chardon et al, 2012) have used on-farm observations of real behaviour (Chardon et al, 2008; Garcia et al, 2005) removing doubt about the accuracy of reported actions. However, validation based on observed behaviour may not reflect future choices under progressive CC.…”

“…Thus, in MELODIE (Chardon et al, 2012) a dynamic model designed to simulate nutrient flows across a mixed farming system, operational (short term, within a season) adaptations associated with crop and grassland management and short term changes in feed rations are incorporated via the STICS crop model. Tactical (annual) adaptations linked with the planning of crop rotations, feed rations, and fertilisation strategy are also simulated using specific sub-models (Chardon, 2008; Chardon et al, 2008). However, farm scale models must also consider adaptations associated with farm infrastructure and resources (e.g.…”

Regenerating degraded soils and increasing water use efficiency on vegetable farms in Uruguay through ecological intensification

“…This approach has been used in environmental impact assessment (e.g. Chardon et al 2008;Osgathorpe et al 2011), impact of policies (e.g. Topp and Mitchell, 2003), social impact assessment (Amede and Delve, 2008), and sustainability assessment (van Calker et al 2008).…”