2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fumaric and sorbic acid as additives in broiler feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
29
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These results corroborate the studies of Pirgozliev et al (2008), who observed AMEn improvement in young broilers fed diets supplemented with fumaric acid and sorbic acid, and also corroborate studies conducted by Ao et al (2009), in which citric acid increased the metabolizable dry matter and crude protein. However, Hernández et al (2006) observed no differences in the metabolization of total and ileal dry matter and crude protein in the 16 to 21 day-old period in broilers fed two levels of formic acid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results corroborate the studies of Pirgozliev et al (2008), who observed AMEn improvement in young broilers fed diets supplemented with fumaric acid and sorbic acid, and also corroborate studies conducted by Ao et al (2009), in which citric acid increased the metabolizable dry matter and crude protein. However, Hernández et al (2006) observed no differences in the metabolization of total and ileal dry matter and crude protein in the 16 to 21 day-old period in broilers fed two levels of formic acid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Another alternative to APE are organic acids (OA), which have shown positive results in poultry production, for reducing the intestinal pH and bacterial growth intolerant to pH changes (Pirgozliev et al, 2008;Ao et al, 2009), thus providing better intestinal health for the bird to obtain maximum nutrient absorption. Additionally, undissociated organic acids can penetrate the lipid membrane of the bacterial cell and decrease intracellular pH, which leads to death (Ricke, 2003), in addition to stimulating pancreatic secretion and providing better intestinal villus integrity (Dibner & Buttin, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with Hernandez et al [10] who found no difference in the cumulative feed consumption between the groups fed organic acids and the control group. However, Patten and Waldroup [15] and Pirgozliev et al [17] found reduction in the feed consumption in the groups fed supplemental organic acids which they have associated with the strong taste associated with the organic acids which would have decreased the palatability of feed and reduced the feed intake but no such effect was observed in the present study. Chicks fed the diets supplemented with organic acids showed a significant (p<0.05) improvement in the FCR as against the chicks fed control diet (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Organic acids may also positively affect the intestinal mucosa (García et al, 2007) and have a beneficial effect on the intestinal health of poultry (Pirgozliev et al, 2008). The addition of sodium butyrate to poultry diets may stimulate the growth of the duodenal mucosa (Hu & Guo, 2007) and may improve dietary energy availability (Pirgolzliev et al 2008), thereby improving nutrient absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%