2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-005-0983-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fulminant inflammatory leukoencephalopathy associated with HAART-induced immune restoration in AIDS-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Abstract: HAART-induced immune restoration is beneficial for patients with AIDS-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). However, in rare instances, an immune-reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) may cause paradoxical clinical deterioration. We report the neuropathological study of an AIDS patient who presented with progressive cognitive deterioration; CD4(+) count was 117 and the HIV viral load >10(4); imaging showed non-enhancing lesions consistent with PML. Following initiation of HAART, CD4(+… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
129
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such lesions have been described in cases of IRIS, 2,3 although in many other CNS-IRIS cases, the MRI findings have shown intensive gadolinium enhancement. 2,8,9 The CNS symptoms of our patient emerged 8 months after complete cessation of immunosuppressive treatment (and half a year after the recovery of blood CD4 cells), a timing compatible with the onset of IRIS. Moreover, several antiepileptics were administered, including phenytoin, carbamazepine and sodium valproate and, owing to drug interactions, the trough level of antifungal voriconazole was found to be low (o0.5 mg/l).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Such lesions have been described in cases of IRIS, 2,3 although in many other CNS-IRIS cases, the MRI findings have shown intensive gadolinium enhancement. 2,8,9 The CNS symptoms of our patient emerged 8 months after complete cessation of immunosuppressive treatment (and half a year after the recovery of blood CD4 cells), a timing compatible with the onset of IRIS. Moreover, several antiepileptics were administered, including phenytoin, carbamazepine and sodium valproate and, owing to drug interactions, the trough level of antifungal voriconazole was found to be low (o0.5 mg/l).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, in a case published by VENDRELY et al 19 about a patient who presented a progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy as a manifestation of IRIS or in other patients with cryptococosis-associated IRIS 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These figures are notable because while some PML-IRIS cases are mild and resolve with continued HAART, other cases may lead to significant morbidity and even mortality because of a severe inflammatory response characterized histopathologically by a marked influx of CD8ϩ T-cell lymphocytes and macrophages in the areas of demyelination and inflammatory reaction. 6,15,37,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] In fact, in 2 cases, PML-IRIS proved fatal after only 2 weeks of HAART. 6 Presumably, the vast outnumbering of CD8ϩ T-cell lymphocytes compared with CD4ϩ T-cell lymphocytes may produce an uncontrolled inflammatory response that could prove fatal.…”
Section: Common Pathogens Associated With Cns-irismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,15 While some of these risk factors are still being debated, such as age and sex, 8 and while criteria are still being expanded and further defined 2,17 and the pathogenesis of IRIS remains not wellunderstood (with some investigators suggesting that there may even be different mechanisms for different pathogens), 7,18,28 there is general acceptance that IRIS can be diagnosed in an HIVinfected individual when there is evidence that the patient's immune system is reconstituting (higher CD4 counts and decreasing HIV-1 RNA levels), yet the patient is paradoxically worsening with the development of new symptoms that cannot be explained by drug toxicity, OI, medical noncompliance, or allergic reactions. 6,16,19 IRIS then is often a diagnosis of exclusion. 8 Diagnosis, however, can be supported by the detection of atypical imaging and laboratory findings, such as new imaging patterns and laboratory tests that might not show viable organisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%