1995
DOI: 10.1108/02644409510799578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully stressed topological design of structures using an evolutionary procedure

Abstract: An automated fully stressed design approach based on the Xie and Steven algorithm is presented. With this algorithm a fully stressed design is obtained by a gradual removal of low stressed material. By applying this evolutionary procedure a layout or topology of a structure can be found from an initial block of material. A fully integrated, interactive program is presented which incorporates automatic mesh generation, finite element analysis and the fully stressed design algorithm. The feasibility of the appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, ine cient material is removed from the design domain to allow the emergence of a new topology. The removal process can be achieved by either varying the elastic modulus as a function of the strain energy density as in the hard-kill=soft-kill methods [1] or by deleting from the design domain the space occupied by groups of elements with low strain energy density values as done in ESO technique [2]. This method is an intuitive engineering approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, ine cient material is removed from the design domain to allow the emergence of a new topology. The removal process can be achieved by either varying the elastic modulus as a function of the strain energy density as in the hard-kill=soft-kill methods [1] or by deleting from the design domain the space occupied by groups of elements with low strain energy density values as done in ESO technique [2]. This method is an intuitive engineering approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the capability for shape optimization remains inherent within any topological optimization process. The two topological optimization methods which have achieved most notable success include the homogenization [4] method, and the evolutionary methods: Hard Kill [5][6][7], Interactive Design Reÿnement [8], and Reverse Adaptivity [9].…”
Section: Topology Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ESO method, inefficient finite elements identified by the sensitivity numbers are slowly removed from the structures to produce optimal designs. Since 1993, extensive studies on ESO have been published in the literature (Xie and Steven 1994;Hinton and Sienz 1995;Chu et al 1996;Xie and Steven 1997;Sienz and Hinton 1997;Guan et al 1999;Kim et al 2000;Rong et al 2000;Li et al 2001a;Steven et al 2002;Li et al 2003). The ESO technique was extended to a bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method, which allows for elements to be removed from the structure as well as to be added to the structure (Querin et al 1998;Yang et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%