1988
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.37.3232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully relativistic electron-impact ionization of atomic ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fully-relativistic subconfiguration-average distorted-wave ionization and excitation cross sections may also be calculated [2].…”
Section: Configuration-average Distorted-wave (Cadw) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully-relativistic subconfiguration-average distorted-wave ionization and excitation cross sections may also be calculated [2].…”
Section: Configuration-average Distorted-wave (Cadw) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the fully-relativistic energies and bound-radial orbitals are generated using Grant's atomic structure code (Grant 2007). The details of this method can be found in Pindzola et al (1988) where it was used to calculate the electron-impact ionization of U 89+ and in Pindzola et al (1989) for the ionization plus excitation-autoionization of U 16+ .…”
Section: Distorted-wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that the mean configurations are used solely in determining the potentials to be used in calculating the radial functions with Eqs. (3) and (4) or the analogs for free electrons, and that basically the calculations are multiconfiguration calculations. Usually we include all the mixing among the states in a complex.…”
Section: Illustrative Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are that (i) different potentials were used in calculating the radial functions with Eqs. (3) and (4) and their analogs for free electrons in the two sets of calculations, and (ii) the Breit interaction was included in calculating the scattering matrix elements in the MP calculations, while it was not in the present calculations. As found in Refs.…”
Section: Illustrative Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation