Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2017
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611974782.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully polynomial-time parameterized computations for graphs and matrices of low treewidth

Abstract: We investigate the complexity of several fundamental polynomial-time solvable problems on graphs and on matrices, when the given instance has low treewidth; in the case of matrices, we consider the treewidth of the graph formed by non-zero entries. In each of the considered cases, the best known algorithms working on general graphs run in polynomial, but far from linear, time. Thus, our goal is to construct algorithms with running time of the form poly(k)·n or poly(k) · n log n, where k is the width of the tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this line of research, Fomin et al studied graph and matrix problems on instances with small treewidth. In particular the authors presented, among other results, an O(k 3 n log n) randomized algorithm for computing the cardinality of a maximum matching and an O(k 4 n log 2 n) randomized algorithm for actually constructing a maximum matching, where k is an upper bound for the treewidth of the given graph [25].…”
Section: Outlook and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this line of research, Fomin et al studied graph and matrix problems on instances with small treewidth. In particular the authors presented, among other results, an O(k 3 n log n) randomized algorithm for computing the cardinality of a maximum matching and an O(k 4 n log 2 n) randomized algorithm for actually constructing a maximum matching, where k is an upper bound for the treewidth of the given graph [25].…”
Section: Outlook and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finally mention that, very recently, two further works delved deeper into "FPT inside P" algorithms for Maximum Matching [25,42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this and the more general spirit of "parameterization for polynomial-time solvable problems" (also referred to as "FPT in P" or "FPTP" for short) [12] forms the starting point of our research. Remarkably, Fomin et al [9] recently developed an algorithm to compute a maximum matching in graphs of treewidth k in O(k 4 n log 2 n) randomized time. Afterwards, Iwata, Ogasawara, and Ohsaka [16] provided an elegant algorithm computing a maximum matching in graphs of treedepth in O( ⋅ m) time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…time algorithm for Maximum-Cardinality Matching on graphs of treewidth at most k, see [13,19]. Turning our attention on denser graph classes of bounded clique-width, we proved in [5]…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 99%