2017
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2017.2703132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Distributed Demand Response Using the Adaptive Diffusion–Stackelberg Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For evaluating the learning capability of the prosumers, we have considered 10 M/NGs each having 100 appliances randomly chosen between low/mid/high-flexible appliances and market clearing price of Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection (PJM) electricity market similar to the data in [49]. Each low/mid-flexible appliance has two possible actions (on and off) and the power consumption of each high-flexible appliance is quantized into 10 consumption (action) levels.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating the learning capability of the prosumers, we have considered 10 M/NGs each having 100 appliances randomly chosen between low/mid/high-flexible appliances and market clearing price of Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection (PJM) electricity market similar to the data in [49]. Each low/mid-flexible appliance has two possible actions (on and off) and the power consumption of each high-flexible appliance is quantized into 10 consumption (action) levels.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In liberalized electricity markets, the retailers buy electricity from the wholesale market and sell it to their customers in a way to maximize social welfare [18]. Besides, in the liberalized ancillary service market, to facilitate PEVs participation and satisfy the minimum regulation capacity (e.g., 0.1 MW), the aggregators are served as an interface between the independent system operator (ISO) and a fleet of PEVs [12].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the price-participant scenarios, the consumption patterns affect the price signal, there is some oscillation in the convergence process around the optimal point. This is because, as much as the customers shift their PEVs consumption to time slots with lower prices, the spot price increases at those slots to prevent creation of sub-peaks [18]. The performance of the centralized method in the price taking (PT) scenario shows that the aggregate system payment is the lowest.…”
Section: B Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few works aiming at centralized optimization have been done to incorporate DR programs into the optimal dispatch of the microgrids . For mostly existing distributed DR programs, they are generally fully distributed rather than distributed multiarea dispatch; ie, each device (DES and load) must be configured with an agent, which makes fully distributed DR programs unrealistic in MGC. In other words, it is more adoptable to do a multiarea scheduling by deploying agents according to the number of microgrids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%