Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2632951.2632981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully distributed algorithms for blind rendezvous in cognitive radio networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A-HCH yields a relatively shorter ETTR than HH while guaranteeing the maximum number of rendezvous channels. CBH [27] is another representative heterogeneous algorithm with only local channel information. CBH converts SUs' IDs into distinct bit strings, which are then utilized to guide rendezvous.…”
Section: A Pairwise Single-radio Rendezvous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A-HCH yields a relatively shorter ETTR than HH while guaranteeing the maximum number of rendezvous channels. CBH [27] is another representative heterogeneous algorithm with only local channel information. CBH converts SUs' IDs into distinct bit strings, which are then utilized to guide rendezvous.…”
Section: A Pairwise Single-radio Rendezvous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both A-HCH and CBH rely on SUs' IDs to construct CH sequences, Table I compares several representative single-radio rendezvous algorithms in terms of MTTR. Here, N is the number of global channels; P is the smallest prime number not smaller than N ; N A and N B are the numbers of local available channels of SU A and SU B , respectively; G is the number of common available channels; l is the length of the choice sequence in A-HCH; ψ is the degree of the symmetrization class in A-HCH; P A and P B are the smallest prime numbers not smaller than N A and N B , respectively; p is equal to max{P A , P B }; l p is a constant determined by SUs' IDs (see [27] for details); and * denotes that the conclusion is only valid for some values of N (see [19] and [21] for details).…”
Section: A Pairwise Single-radio Rendezvous Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature, most of the existing rendezvous algorithms [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] implicitly assume that each user is equipped with one radio (i.e., one wireless transceiver). That is, each user hops on one channel in one time slot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%