2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully decoupling geometry from discretization in the Bloch–Floquet finite element analysis of phononic crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Band-structure analysis, a typical eigenvalue problem in wave engineering, examines the inherent wave-propagating characteristics of a system [52,53]. Applying an input voltage to a piezoelectric defect falls in the same vein as applying an external load to a structure.…”
Section: Prediction Of a Phononic Bandgap Defect-band Frequencies And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band-structure analysis, a typical eigenvalue problem in wave engineering, examines the inherent wave-propagating characteristics of a system [52,53]. Applying an input voltage to a piezoelectric defect falls in the same vein as applying an external load to a structure.…”
Section: Prediction Of a Phononic Bandgap Defect-band Frequencies And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 FEM is a four-step process: (i) discretization of the solution area into the finite number of subregions or elements, (ii) derivation of the controlling equation corresponding to each subregion, (iii) gathering of all the elements in the solution region, and (iv) finding out the solution of the obtained system of equations. 46 The main challenge in FEM is the requirement of matching mesh, which means that finite element edges should match with material interfaces and sides of the periodic unit cell (PUC). Even with known geometries, producing matching meshes is computationally costly and inaccurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 In addition, a significant amount of time and computer memory is needed for 3D finite element analysis. 46 We have taken care of both of these aspects by selecting appropriate boundary conditions and mesh size, which are discussed subsequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Since the coupling conditions at the interface of the matrix and the scatterers are ignored when using the finite difference time domain method, poor results will be obtained. 10,11 Some methods, such as the multiple scattering theory method, 12 the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map method, 13,14 the finite element method 15 and the meshless methods, 16,17 consider both coupling conditions at the interface and transverse waves in solid parts. However, both the multiple scattering theory method and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map method are only suitable for special scatterer shapes such as circle and sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%