2012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully covered metallic stents in biliary stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation

Abstract: For endotherapy of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation, metallic stents should not be used as the primary modality. In patients in whom the standard approach fails, treatment with temporary SEMS placement can solve biliary complications in almost three-quarters of cases; however stent migration(33 %) remains a problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
52
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
52
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies in partially covered stents and FCSEMS for benign biliary strictures have been positive [5][6][7]. There have been several studies of FCSEMS in benign biliary strictures indicating good stricture resolution rates [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early studies in partially covered stents and FCSEMS for benign biliary strictures have been positive [5][6][7]. There have been several studies of FCSEMS in benign biliary strictures indicating good stricture resolution rates [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a multiple plastic stents, the potential benefits of a single FCSEMS are in its relative simplicity and the need for only two ERCP procedures, one for insertion and the other for removal. Multiple case series have been published using such stents after liver transplantation, with generally good outcomes [6,8,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could provide more ample and prompt dilation than plastic stents and eliminate the need for multiple sequential ERCP stent exchanges and their attendant costs. 25,26 A recent multicentric study 27 confirmed the primary requisite of these stents, that is, removability in all cases (with, however, the need for more than 1 procedure in 5%), and showed that a 6-month indwell was able to provide stricture resolution in approximately 70% of patients with postcholecystectomy or anastomotic post-OLTx strictures. These results are surely not better than those reported with multiple plastic stents in these indications, a feature probably related to the high spontaneous migration rate of FCSEMS (around 17% in both groups).…”
Section: Postoperative Biliary Strictures and Leaksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…23 Furthermore reported cases of postcholecystectomy biliary strictures treated with FC-SEMS are very rare (Table 1). 17,[24][25][26][27][28] Anastomotic biliary strictures following liver transplantation…”
Section: Postcholecystectomy Biliary Stricturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 FC-SEMS have been proposed to dilate anastomotic strictures following OLT because their removability was safe and possible in almost all cases; results are still under evaluation due to the high incidence of stents migration and the high stricture recurrence rate at the 2-year follow-up (Table 3). 26,28,47,48 Biliary strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is an inflammatory process characterized by destruction of pancreatic parenchyma and ductal structures with subsequent formation of fibrosis. 49 Strictures of the common bile duct (CBD) can be found in 3-46% of patients with advanced CP.…”
Section: Postcholecystectomy Biliary Stricturesmentioning
confidence: 99%