2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully coupled LES-DEM of particle interaction and agglomeration in a turbulent channel flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first LES of particle-laden flow, in particular, was performed under the assumption of negligible contribution of the SGS fluctuations to the filtered fluid velocity seen by inertial particles [11]: The choice was justified considering that inertial particles act as low-pass filters that respond selectively to removal of SGS flow scales according to a characteristic frequency proportional to 1/τ p , where τ p is the particle relaxation time (a measure of particle inertia). The same assumption has been used in other studies [12][13][14][15] in which the filtering due to particle inertia and the moderate Reynolds number of the flow had a relatively weak effect on the (one-particle, two-particles) dispersion statistics examined. However, several studies [16][17][18] have demonstrated that neglecting the effect of SGS velocity fluctuations on particle motion leads to significant errors in the quantification of large-scale clustering and preferential concentration, two macroscopic phenomena that result from particle preferential distribution at the periphery of strong vortical regions into low-strain regions [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first LES of particle-laden flow, in particular, was performed under the assumption of negligible contribution of the SGS fluctuations to the filtered fluid velocity seen by inertial particles [11]: The choice was justified considering that inertial particles act as low-pass filters that respond selectively to removal of SGS flow scales according to a characteristic frequency proportional to 1/τ p , where τ p is the particle relaxation time (a measure of particle inertia). The same assumption has been used in other studies [12][13][14][15] in which the filtering due to particle inertia and the moderate Reynolds number of the flow had a relatively weak effect on the (one-particle, two-particles) dispersion statistics examined. However, several studies [16][17][18] have demonstrated that neglecting the effect of SGS velocity fluctuations on particle motion leads to significant errors in the quantification of large-scale clustering and preferential concentration, two macroscopic phenomena that result from particle preferential distribution at the periphery of strong vortical regions into low-strain regions [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LES coupled to the hard-sphere collision model [15][16][17] and energy-balanced and momentum-balanced agglomeration models 4,[18][19][20] have been used to study interparticle collision and particle agglomeration in turbulent channel flow. Afkhami et al 21 and Hellestø et al 22 applied LES coupled to the discrete element method based on the soft-sphere collision model 23 to model particle agglomeration in solid-liquid turbulent channel flow. Ho and Sommerfeld 24 , and…”
Section: Takedownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased surface area of garnet after modification explains the better dispersion of MG microparticles [33]. Surface energy of unMG is relatively high: according to the principle of minimum energy, unMG particles will aggregate to reduce surface energy [36]. Therefore, a serious reunion phenomenon occurred among garnet particles.…”
Section: Physicochemical Properties Of Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%