2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3271518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Connected U-Net and Its Application on Reconstructing Successively Sampled Seismic Data

Abstract: One of the major hot topics in seismic data processing is the reconstruction of successively sampled seismic data. There are numerous traditional methods proposed for addressing this issue; however, they still have unavoidable drawbacks, such as high computational cost and sensitive tuning parameters. In this study, we suggest a deep learning model for reconstructing successively sampled seismic data, termed fully connected U-Net (FCU-Net). FCU-Net maintains the high-resolution representations by connecting th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network architecture used is the U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015), which is a convolutional neural network (CNN) originally developed for biomedical image segmentation. This architecture has demonstrated effectiveness on various seismic imaging tasks, such as fault segmentation (Wu et al, 2019), multiple reflection removal (Bugge et al, 2020) and most relevant to this work -seismic interpolation (Fang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2023) and near offset extrapolation (Qu et al, 2021). Furthermore, it is a simple model to parameterize and train.…”
Section: Training Data and Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The network architecture used is the U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015), which is a convolutional neural network (CNN) originally developed for biomedical image segmentation. This architecture has demonstrated effectiveness on various seismic imaging tasks, such as fault segmentation (Wu et al, 2019), multiple reflection removal (Bugge et al, 2020) and most relevant to this work -seismic interpolation (Fang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2023) and near offset extrapolation (Qu et al, 2021). Furthermore, it is a simple model to parameterize and train.…”
Section: Training Data and Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been an increase in the usage of deep learning methods for seismic interpolation and near offset reconstruction, where neural networks are trained to interpolate or generate missing traces. Examples of this have included a generative adversarial network for trace interpolation (Kaur et al, 2021), a convolutional neural network (CNN) for near offset extrapolation at shallow subsurface depths (<0.1 s of traveltime) (Qu et al, 2021), a CNN for interpolation of successively sampled seismic data (Li et al, 2023) and a multidirectional CNN for self-supervised reconstruction of gaps in seismic data (Abedi & Pardo, 2022). One of the main challenges of a deep learning approach is in creating or finding training data with rich near offset information, as source-over-cable field data is a rarity, and synthetic training data often lacks the heterogeneity and complexity of real seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the connection of feature maps between the encoder and decoder allows for fine-grained information transfer during upsampling. Such U-Net algorithms have shown excellent results in the field of seismology, including the reconstruction of seismic-signal data resolution [45,46] and P-wave FAP detection studies [47][48][49].…”
Section: Spectrogram Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the connection of feature maps between the encoder and decoder allows for fine-grained information transfer during upsampling. Such U-Net algorithms have shown excellent results in the field of seismology, including the reconstruction of seismic-signal data resolution[45,46] and P-wave FAP detection studies[47][48][49].Figure7illustrates the U-Net architecture proposed in this study. The model consists mainly of an encoder and a decoder, both of which are designed with identical layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%