2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automatic segmentation of left ventricular anatomy in 3-D LGE-MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented workflow could be speed up by reducing the number of needed interaction. Particularly, the delineation work on LGE-MRI SAX view could be automated such as seen in [15]. During the intervention, thickness information confirmed to be a driver of clinician's confidence when ablating, as the safety margin before perforating cardiac's wall was known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The presented workflow could be speed up by reducing the number of needed interaction. Particularly, the delineation work on LGE-MRI SAX view could be automated such as seen in [15]. During the intervention, thickness information confirmed to be a driver of clinician's confidence when ablating, as the safety margin before perforating cardiac's wall was known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Kurzendorfer et al utilized a two-step registration-based method to delineate the LV myocardium and evaluated their proposed method on 30 clinical 3D LGE-MRI datasets from individual subjects obtained at two different clinical sites, which reported DSC of 83% and 80% for the endocardium and epicardium, respectively. 48 We used a majority voting system for final label prediction from three orthogonal views that result in more confident prediction. This is particularly useful in ambiguous cases, where suppression of false-positive errors can be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literature, two main families of techniques have been proposed to automatically segment LGE-MRI data. The first one segments directly the LGE-MRI images by using different techniques such as graph-cuts [1], atlasbased registration [2], or more recently Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [3]. However, these techniques generally lack robustness due to the limited availability of LGE-MRI datasets for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%