2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02334-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for locally advanced rectal cancer: feasibility and efficiency

Kouta Hirotaki,
Kento Tomizawa,
Shunsuke Moriya
et al.

Abstract: Background Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has emerged as a promising technique, but the planning process can be time-consuming and dependent on planner expertise. We aimed to develop a fully automated VMAT planning program for LARC and evaluate its feasibility and efficiency. Methods A total of 26 LARC patients who received VMAT treatment and the computed tomography (CT) scans were included in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method is highly dependent on the training datasets [ 17 ], and tends to struggle when adapting to new cases that differ significantly from the training data. In contrast, the script-based methods don’t require a prior training or learning step [ 18 , 19 ]. In the radiotherapy of cervical cancer, particularly with the VMAT technique, mature automated planning methods have already been developed and have been proven to achieve better plan quality and greater efficiency than manual planning [ 20 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is highly dependent on the training datasets [ 17 ], and tends to struggle when adapting to new cases that differ significantly from the training data. In contrast, the script-based methods don’t require a prior training or learning step [ 18 , 19 ]. In the radiotherapy of cervical cancer, particularly with the VMAT technique, mature automated planning methods have already been developed and have been proven to achieve better plan quality and greater efficiency than manual planning [ 20 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%