2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.4.1.014501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks

Abstract: Abstract. Quantitative cephalometry plays an essential role in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and surgery. Development of fully automated techniques for these procedures is important to enable consistently accurate computerized analyses. We study the application of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for fully automated quantitative cephalometry for the first time. The proposed framework utilizes CNNs for detection of landmarks that describe the anatomy of the depicted patient and yield quantitative esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
188
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The performance of an automated identification system (AI) has traditionally been compared by the successful detection rates of 19 skeletal landmarks with a 2-mm range, which has conventionally been accepted as a clinical error range at AI performance competitions. [4][5][6] Rather than again comparing certain AI techniques to other AI techniques to determine which were more accurate, the present study proposed a new automatic identification method and tested whether this new AI method was better and more reliable than clinically experienced human experts. This could be more interesting and actually applicable to clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The performance of an automated identification system (AI) has traditionally been compared by the successful detection rates of 19 skeletal landmarks with a 2-mm range, which has conventionally been accepted as a clinical error range at AI performance competitions. [4][5][6] Rather than again comparing certain AI techniques to other AI techniques to determine which were more accurate, the present study proposed a new automatic identification method and tested whether this new AI method was better and more reliable than clinically experienced human experts. This could be more interesting and actually applicable to clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has shown outstanding performance in solving many problems in computer vision and biomedical applications. (Giordano et al, 2005;LeCun, Bengio, & Hinton, 2015;Wang et al, 2016) Lindner et al (Lindner et al, 2016) Arik et al (Arik et al, 2017), conducted deep learning-based 2D cephalometry using CNN, a rapidly developing deep learning algorithm that uses a variation of multilayer perceptrons (LeCun, 2015), inspired by the connectivity of the biological nervous system. (Huang & LeCun, 2006) It is especially suitable for image processing and recognition in that it exploits spatial correlations by imposing local connectivity patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our approach with the top two methods [7,20] in IEEE ISBI 2015 Challenge and two new approaches proposed by Arik et al [11] and Payer et al [22]. We also remove the AFPF module and the attention mechanism respectively to do the ablation study.…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two frameworks [6,7] combining the random forests regression-voting and the statistical shape analysis techniques perform well in the IEEE ISBI 2014 and 2015 Challenges [8,9]. Since then, almost all the methods are benchmarked against the Grand Challenges dataset [10,11,22,23]. There are also some hybrid-based methods [12] integrating different techniques mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%