2015
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/82/1/012059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated orientation relationship calculation and prior austenite reconstruction by random walk clustering

Abstract: Abstract. Two new methods, one for determining the experimentally observed Orientation Relationship (OR) and another for reconstructing prior austenite phase, are proposed. Both methods are based on the angular deviation of the OR at the grain boundaries. The first algorithm identifies the optimum OR using the misorientation distribution of the entire scan i.e. without manual selection of parent grains. The second algorithm reconstructs the parent phase using a random walk clustering technique that identifies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected tolerance ε should be a compromise between the significance of the misorientation data and necessity to exclude random boundaries from the analysis. As it was noted above, the present method is similar to that suggested by Gomes and Kestens [18]. The latter method is yet only briefly outlined in [18], and thus one cannot judge the similarity and difference of the techniques.…”
Section: Approach To Determination Of Orientation Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The selected tolerance ε should be a compromise between the significance of the misorientation data and necessity to exclude random boundaries from the analysis. As it was noted above, the present method is similar to that suggested by Gomes and Kestens [18]. The latter method is yet only briefly outlined in [18], and thus one cannot judge the similarity and difference of the techniques.…”
Section: Approach To Determination Of Orientation Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…As it was noted above, the present method is similar to that suggested by Gomes and Kestens [18]. The latter method is yet only briefly outlined in [18], and thus one cannot judge the similarity and difference of the techniques. In our calculations ε was chosen so that not less than 90% of actual boundaries have been included in the procedure.…”
Section: Approach To Determination Of Orientation Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the exact parallelism of planes and directions of the K-S OR cannot be observed in actual crystallographic measurements of martensite, the consistent variant labeling system by Morito et al [12] has been used to successfully characterize a number of martensitic/bainitic microstructures with varying orientation relationships between fcc and bcc structure. In the second step, the grain map was divided into discrete clusters using the Markov clustering method [13] proposed by Gomes and Kestens [14]. The parent austenite orientation was then calculated for each cluster separately, resulting in a reconstructed orientation map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, quantitative micro-texture analyses using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) were performed on the powder and the AM objects of a cold-work tool steel. In order to gain an explicit correlation between the microstructures and process conditions, a recent technique for the reconstruction of prior austenite grains [26][27][28] was utilized. Thus, this study could provide a useful example of the procedures to characterize the microstructures of tool and other martensitic steels for AM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%