2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013gl058742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full‐wave effects on shear wave splitting

Abstract: Seismic anisotropy in the mantle plays an important role in our understanding of the Earth's internal dynamics, and shear wave splitting has always been a key observable in the investigation of seismic anisotropy. To date the interpretation of shear wave splitting in terms of anisotropy has been largely based on ray-theoretical modeling of a single vertically incident plane SKS or SKKS wave. In this study, we use sensitivity kernels of shear wave splitting to anisotropic parameters calculated by the normal-mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Niu & Perez 2004); however, we must first rule out heterogeneous upper-mantle anisotropy or full waveform effects as making major contributions to the observed discrepancies. Previous work taking into account finite frequency wave propagation (for homogeneous upper-mantle anisotropy models) has shown that modest differences in SI (up to ∼ 0.2) for SKS and SKKS phases of the same event-station pair can result from waveform interference effects (Lin et al 2014). Specifically, Lin et al (2014) showed that waveform interference can strongly affect SKS-SKKS SI measurements for shallow sources (<20 km) at epicentral distances less than than ∼100 • .…”
Section: Sks-skks Splitting Intensity Discrepancies and Their Interprmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Niu & Perez 2004); however, we must first rule out heterogeneous upper-mantle anisotropy or full waveform effects as making major contributions to the observed discrepancies. Previous work taking into account finite frequency wave propagation (for homogeneous upper-mantle anisotropy models) has shown that modest differences in SI (up to ∼ 0.2) for SKS and SKKS phases of the same event-station pair can result from waveform interference effects (Lin et al 2014). Specifically, Lin et al (2014) showed that waveform interference can strongly affect SKS-SKKS SI measurements for shallow sources (<20 km) at epicentral distances less than than ∼100 • .…”
Section: Sks-skks Splitting Intensity Discrepancies and Their Interprmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous work taking into account finite frequency wave propagation (for homogeneous upper-mantle anisotropy models) has shown that modest differences in SI (up to ∼ 0.2) for SKS and SKKS phases of the same event-station pair can result from waveform interference effects (Lin et al 2014). Specifically, Lin et al (2014) showed that waveform interference can strongly affect SKS-SKKS SI measurements for shallow sources (<20 km) at epicentral distances less than than ∼100 • . In the epicentral distance range, we use in this study (108 • -140 • ), we expect waveform interference in the upper mantle to alter the SIs of the same station-event SKS-SKKS pairs by at most 10 per cent, with maximum interference at distances of ∼130 • (Lin et al 2014).…”
Section: Sks-skks Splitting Intensity Discrepancies and Their Interprmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before we can interpret our splitting intensity discrepancy data set in detail, however, we first consider to what extent effects other than lower mantle anisotropy may contribute to the observed discrepancies, such as full waveform interference effects or heterogeneous anisotropic structure in the shallow upper mantle or crust (Deng et al, 2017). Lin et al (2014) 10.1029/2018JB017160…”
Section: 1029/2018jb017160mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monteiller & Chevrot (2011) used data from dense seismic networks in southern California to apply finitefrequency SKS splitting tomography, producing a model of lateral and depth variations of anisotropy parameters. Lin et al (2014a) applied a full-wave approach to the computation of sensitivities and a multiscale parametrization to the inversion of a similar data set from southern California, based on insights from full-wave modelling of SKS phases (Lin et al 2014b).…”
Section: Finite Frequency Sks Splitting Tomography 239mentioning
confidence: 99%