“…Various Smad knockout (KO) mice have been generated: Smad2 and Smad4 KOs were lethal, whereas the Smad3 KO was viable (Nomura and Li, 1998;Sirard et al, 1998;Waldrip et al, 1998;Weinstein et al, 1998;Zhu et al, 1998;Datto et al, 1999;Yang et al, 1999b). The phenotype of Smad3 KO mice was interesting in multiple ways: (1) mice were viable and relatively normal (Datto and Wang, 2000); (2) the TGF-β response was somewhat amplified in fibroblasts, which is contrary to what one would expect for an R-Smad KO (Piek et al, 2001); (3) they displayed improved wound healing capacities for various types of injury, which were marked by an increased rate of re-epithelialization and significantly reduced scarring (Ashcroft et al, 1999;Flanders et al, 2003;Falanga et al, 2004); and (4) they had less inflammation following skin wounding (Ashcroft et al, 1999;Yang et al, 1999b;Ashcroft and Roberts, 2000). All of these changes observed in the Smad3 KO mice, as compared with their wild-type littermates, actually display a striking resemblance to the early phases of regeneration in axolotls (Roy and Lévesque, 2006).…”