2020
DOI: 10.1177/2325967120929330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears With or Without Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes Using an Open Approach and Contemporary Tendon Repair Techniques

Abstract: Background: Gluteus medius (GM) tears are a well-established source of pain and disability. An open approach has been recognized with complete full-thickness and large GM tears, yet the current literature provides few reports on outcomes for this specific situation. Purpose: To report and analyze minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from patients who underwent open GM repair in the setting of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-term clinical outcomes of the present series were excellent. The improvement in mHHS (34 points) was comparable to those reported in the recent literature at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up for open or endoscopic repair of gluteal tendon tears (18.4–46.5 points; Table III ) [ 13 , 18 , 20 , 38–43 ]. All patients included in the present series (100%) met the PASS in terms of mHHS, which compares favourably with the results of Maldonado et al [ 18 ] (69%) and Kirby et al [ 40 ] (88%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The short-term clinical outcomes of the present series were excellent. The improvement in mHHS (34 points) was comparable to those reported in the recent literature at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up for open or endoscopic repair of gluteal tendon tears (18.4–46.5 points; Table III ) [ 13 , 18 , 20 , 38–43 ]. All patients included in the present series (100%) met the PASS in terms of mHHS, which compares favourably with the results of Maldonado et al [ 18 ] (69%) and Kirby et al [ 40 ] (88%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Maldonado et al . reported a pre-operative mHHS of 54.7 ± 15.9 points for patients with full thickness GM tears [ 18 ]. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the mHHS at short follow-up was reported to be 13 points [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gluteus medius tears have increasingly been shown to contribute to chronic lateral hip pain 8 , 22 . Once diagnosed on physical examination and MRI, the modalities to treat gluteus medius tears that are large and retracted with signs of major fatty atrophy are scarce 11 , 12 , 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With nonoperative treatment, approximately 90% of cases are resolved 2 ; however, in patients who experience continuous and recalcitrant lateral hip pain, abductor weakness, and a Trendelenburg gait, clinical suspicion should be raised for spontaneous avulsion of the gluteus medius tendon 3 . Open repair of the gluteus medius is often successful; however, the failure rate can be high if what remains is a deficient muscle or tendon 4 - 8 . Moreover, even successful repairs may show fatty degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a predisposing factor for retears 7 , 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Throughout the study period, the diagnostic portion of the endoscopy remained consistent despite various modifications in the tendon repair techniques. 5,9,11,17,30…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%