2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-7913(00)00074-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-Text Databases and the Journal Cancellation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study only major articles were examined and supplementary material was not evaluated. The findings showed that only 83% of the major articles were available online (Sprague & Chambers, 2000). In a follow-up study 10 years later, 20 of the original 79 titles were still available in aggregators subscribed at KFL.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study only major articles were examined and supplementary material was not evaluated. The findings showed that only 83% of the major articles were available online (Sprague & Chambers, 2000). In a follow-up study 10 years later, 20 of the original 79 titles were still available in aggregators subscribed at KFL.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kaplan et al (2006) and Sprague and Chambers (2000) recount cases where librarians prefer to maintain redundant holdings in multiple formats. Librarians' recognition of online resources' superior capability for locating information, as reported by Smith (2009), Holloway and Sutton (1990), Duff and Cherry (2000, October), and Williams (1996), has been tempered somewhat, according to McKinzie (2005), by the ongoing acquisition costs associated with online resources, by the desirability of resource stability, and by reluctance to discard what has already been purchased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sprague and Chambers studied whether the full-text versions of journals acquired through aggregator databases are adequate substitutes for print, and found problems with currency, coverage, graphics, and stability. Though aggregator databases provide access to many more journal titles than can be acquired for the same cost in print, they concluded that this type of full-text access "is still not a complete substitute for printed versions of journals and libraries contemplating replacing printed versions with full text should do so with caution" [37].…”
Section: Can Electronic Really Substitute For Print?mentioning
confidence: 99%