Full-Range Public Health Leadership, Part 1: Quantitative Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundWorkforce and leadership development are central to the future of public health. However, public health has been slow to translate and apply leadership models from other professions and to incorporate local perspectives in understanding public health leadership.PurposeThis study utilized the full-range leadership model in order to examine public health leadership. Specifically, it sought to measure leadership styles among local health department directors and to understand the context of leadership in local health departments.MethodsLeadership styles among local health department directors (n = 13) were examined using survey methodology. Quantitative analysis methods included descriptive statistics, boxplots, and Pearson bivariate correlations using SPSS v18.0.FindingsSelf-reported leadership styles were highly correlated to leadership outcomes at the organizational level. However, they were not related to county health rankings. Results suggest the preeminence of leader behaviors and providing individual consideration to staff as compared to idealized attributes of leaders, intellectual stimulation, or inspirational motivation.ImplicationsHolistic leadership assessment instruments such as the multifactor leadership questionnaire can be useful in assessing public health leaders’ approaches and outcomes. Comprehensive, 360-degree reviews may be especially helpful. Further research is needed to examine the effectiveness of public health leadership development models, as well as the extent that public health leadership impacts public health outcomes.

Unravelling the role of leadership in motivation of health workers in a Moroccan public hospital: a realist evaluation

“…Our study, similar to other studies,103–105 indicated that transformational leaders who show individual consideration and clearly communicate their vision increase self-esteem of staff and perceived supervisor support, and satisfy their relatedness and autonomy needs. This may contribute to staff commitment, mutual trust and extra-role performance.…”

Building Interdisciplinary Leadership Skills among Health Practitioners in the Twenty-First Century: An Innovative Training Model

“…Although contextualized within the clinical care setting, these competencies are equally important for leadership education in general. It is known that individual reported leadership styles are correlated with leadership outcomes at the organizational level ( 6 ). Recent work has also evaluated the impact of a case competition-driven model on development of interprofessional competencies among graduate students and provides a model for assessing interprofessional competency development adapted to non-clinical professions ( 7 ).…”

Editorial: Leading People – Managing Organizations: Contemporary Public Health Leadership

“…Findings such as these provide the requisite tools to provide training opportunities related to emotional intelligence and trust in organizations. In a two-part article, Carlton et al ( 11 , 12 ) consider full-range public health leadership as a useful construct for considering the complex challenges faced by effective public health leaders. They provide both a quantitative as well as a qualitative analysis and synthesis utilizing transformational leadership as a model for their study.…”