2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(02)01284-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full potential calculations on the electron bandstructures of Sphalerite, Pyrite and Chalcopyrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b that the broader Cu L 3 peak situated $5 eV above the leading absorption peak would arise from transitions to Cu s-states and, to a lesser extent, Cu d-states. Most of the previous electronic structure calculations for chalcopyrite, including those using FEFF8 with the Hedin-Lundqvist exchange potential (Lavrentyev et al, 2004), are in broad agreement with the FEFF8 calculations carried out in the present study (Hamajima et al, 1981;Tossell et al, 1982;Petiau et al, 1988;Kurmaev et al, 1998;Edelbro et al, 2003).…”
Section: Chalcopyritesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5b that the broader Cu L 3 peak situated $5 eV above the leading absorption peak would arise from transitions to Cu s-states and, to a lesser extent, Cu d-states. Most of the previous electronic structure calculations for chalcopyrite, including those using FEFF8 with the Hedin-Lundqvist exchange potential (Lavrentyev et al, 2004), are in broad agreement with the FEFF8 calculations carried out in the present study (Hamajima et al, 1981;Tossell et al, 1982;Petiau et al, 1988;Kurmaev et al, 1998;Edelbro et al, 2003).…”
Section: Chalcopyritesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Since the satellite intensity is very low for monovalent compounds, the d-count is not specified in this case in Table 1. The fact that the d-count is always quite far from d 10 is due to the covalent character of the compounds as confirmed by the results of bandstructure calculations (Hamajima et al, 1981;Kurmaev et al, 1998;Edelbro et al, 2003). For instance, the calculation by Hamajima et al (1981) quotes values for Cu in CuFeS 2 of n d = 9.63, n 4s = 0.54 and n 4p = 0.76.…”
Section: Cu 2p X-ray Photoemissionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Recommended calibration values are 931.2 eV for the Cu L 3 peak in CuO and 707.7 eV for the Fe L 3 peak in Fe metal. All theoretical and experimental investigations recognise the covalent character of chalcopyrite which involves extensive overlapping of Cu and Fe metal d orbitals across the whole valence band (Tossell et al, 1982;Kurmaev et al, 1998;Edelbro et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an intrinsic semiconductor that exhibits both n-and p-type conductivity [7,8]. The band gap is around 1 eV thus it can efficiently be used as a photocatalyst in the destruction of both organic and inorganic pollutants [8,9]. Very recent evidence suggests that the defect sites of pyrite are capable of splitting H 2 O to form reactive OH radicals (the key for chemical oxidation of organic pollutants) in the absence of light [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%