2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/841745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Mouth Oral Rehabilitation by Maxillary Implant Supported Hybrid Denture Employing a Fiber Reinforced Material Instead of Conventional PMMA

Abstract: Many people have life-long problems with their dentures, such as difficulties with speaking and eating, loose denture, and sore mouth syndrome. The evolution of dental implant supported prosthesis gives these patients normal healthy life for their functional and esthetic advantages. This case report presents the fabrication of maxillary implant supported hybrid prosthesis by using Nanofilled Composite (NFC) material in teeth construction to rehabilitate a complete denture wearer patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient-based outcomes reported in the present study depend mainly on the biomechanics of the prostheses (full-arch fixed dental prostheses) rather than on the material composition itself (PEEK-NFC) and that other options such as conventional metal-ceramic (metal framework veneered with hand-layered porcelain) or full ceramic restorations (veneered or monolithic frameworks) could get even better results. However, PEEK is a promising material because of its high biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, good wear resistance, low plaque affinity, and high bond strength with veneering composites/luting cements [ 47 ], although, few studies have assessed this material for CAD-CAM prostheses in clinical settings [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 47 , 48 ]. This material would be suitable for patients experiencing either metal or acrylic allergies and is cheaper than either conventional metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia restorations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patient-based outcomes reported in the present study depend mainly on the biomechanics of the prostheses (full-arch fixed dental prostheses) rather than on the material composition itself (PEEK-NFC) and that other options such as conventional metal-ceramic (metal framework veneered with hand-layered porcelain) or full ceramic restorations (veneered or monolithic frameworks) could get even better results. However, PEEK is a promising material because of its high biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, good wear resistance, low plaque affinity, and high bond strength with veneering composites/luting cements [ 47 ], although, few studies have assessed this material for CAD-CAM prostheses in clinical settings [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 47 , 48 ]. This material would be suitable for patients experiencing either metal or acrylic allergies and is cheaper than either conventional metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia restorations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent meta-analysis performed by Borges et al [ 9 ], there is a lack of studies documenting patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) for implant prosthodontics, in particular, for oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and satisfaction. Similarly, most of the evidence regarding the treatment outcomes of the ISFR comes from either layered ceramic fused to metal or resin-veneered metal frameworks [ 11 ] (usually gold alloys, titanium, or Cobalt–chromium) [ 12 ], and there is a lack of studies focusing on ISFR made of innovative materials such as PEEK (poly-ether-ether-ketone) veneered with nano-filled composite (NFC) [ 13 ]. In the field of dentistry, the possibility of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) together with its biocompatibility and shock absorbing features [ 14 ] has enabled the increased use of PEEK as substructure material to be veneered with composite or acrylic resins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reemplazo y disminución de soporte de tejido blando en el volumen de la subestructura metálica y en la altura de las coronas en comparación con las prótesis metal porcelana. Además de estas ventajas estéticas, la pró-tesis híbrida trabaja como un absorbente de fuerzas reduciendo la carga que van sobre los implantes (13). El porcentaje de éxito con el tratamiento de prótesis hibrida implanto soportada es alta, como lo demuestra una revisión sistémica publicada en el 2014, donde se incluyeron 18 estudios para la evaluación, se encontraron altas tasas de supervivencia (5 a 10 años) de 93,3% a 100% para las prótesis y de 87,9% a 100% para los implantes de soporte (14).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Nanokompozit protez dişlerinin direnci akrilik rezinden daha fazla, fakat mikro partiküllü kompozit dişlerden daha az bulunmuştur 62 . Dolayısıyla, şiddetli alveoler kemik kaybı olan hastaların implant destekli protetik tedavisinde CAD/CAM tekniği ile üretilen nano partiküllü kompozit materyali ile güçlendirilmiş hibrit protezlerin kullanımı savunulmuştur 63 . c) CAD/CAM Altyapılarla Kullanılan PEEK ve PEKK Üstyapı Materyallerinin Kullanımı Polietereterketon (PEEK), poliarileterketon (PAEK) grubundan olup, yüksek performanslı polimerden oluşur.…”
Section: B)unclassified