2004
DOI: 10.1039/b313231p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full description of the orientational statistics of molecules near to interfaces. Water at the interface with CCl4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
186
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
14
186
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,90,91 It appears that some different conclusions were drawn on the molecular orientation and structure of the air/water interface in different studies. 6,91,92 Nevertheless, many of these studies concluded that the dipole vector of the interfacial water molecules prefers lying parallel to the interface and have one of the O-H bond protrude out of the liquid phase. The majority of the conclusions from theoretical calculations agree satisfactorily with the experimental analysis of ours and previous studies, but all the simulation results were with significantly broader orientational distributions.…”
Section: Molecular Structure At Air/water Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,90,91 It appears that some different conclusions were drawn on the molecular orientation and structure of the air/water interface in different studies. 6,91,92 Nevertheless, many of these studies concluded that the dipole vector of the interfacial water molecules prefers lying parallel to the interface and have one of the O-H bond protrude out of the liquid phase. The majority of the conclusions from theoretical calculations agree satisfactorily with the experimental analysis of ours and previous studies, but all the simulation results were with significantly broader orientational distributions.…”
Section: Molecular Structure At Air/water Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…77,78 We have shown that the angular polar coordinates  and  of the external direction (surface normal vector) in a local Cartesian frame fixed to the individual molecules represents a sufficient choice of such a parameter pair. 77,78 Further, since  is an angle between two general spatial vectors (i.e., the z axis of the local frame and the surface normal), whereas  is an angle of two vectors restricted, by definition, to lay in a given plane (i.e., the xy plane of the local frame), uncorrelated orientation of the molecules with the surface only results in a uniform distribution if cos and  are chosen to be the independent variables.…”
Section: Orientation At the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…56,57 In order to get information about the preferred orientations of the adsorbed methylamines in this work, the external vector is defined by the surface normal vector, pointing away from the ice phase (X), while methylamine molecules are considered as the rigid bodies, and their local Cartesian frame is defined in the following way: the N atom is its origin, the N-C bond corresponds to axis z (where the unit vector z points to the CH 3 group), axis y is parallel with the line connecting the two H atoms of the NH 2 group, and axis x is perpendicular to the above two, directed in such a way that the x coordinates of the two NH 2 hydrogen atoms are positive. Thus,  is the angle between axis z of this frame and the surface normal vector, X, while  is the angle of axis x and the projection of X to the xy plane of this local frame, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Orientational Preferences Of the Adsorbed Methylamine Molecumentioning
confidence: 99%