1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112080001577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-coverage film cooling. Part 1. Three-dimensional measurements of turbulence structure

Abstract: Hydrodynamic measurements were made with a triaxial hot wire in the full-coverage region and the recovery region following an array of injection holes inclined downstream, at 30° to the surface. The data were taken under isothermal conditions at ambient temperature and pressure for two blowing ratios: M = 0·9 and M = 0·4. (The ratio M = ρjetUjet/ρ∞U∞, where U is the mean velocity and ρ is the density. Subscripts jet and ∞ stand for injectant and free stream, respectively.) Profiles of the three mean-velocity c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is somewhat expected because the Fourier analysis showed that the range of the most dominant frequencies of the combustor unsteady pressure data was in As mentioned earlier, at a high blowing ratio of M = 1.0, the coolant jet lift-off is generated under steady flow conditions (0 Hz), resulting in the entrainment of hot mainstream gases underneath the jet. The entrainment does not lead to much mixing near the wall [46]. If the oscillation frequency is increased from 0 to 90 Hz, more entrainment is induced under the cooling jet resulting in less disturbance and a lower increase of the heat transfer coefficient or the Stanton number ratio.…”
Section: Effects Of Multi-frequency Unsteady Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is somewhat expected because the Fourier analysis showed that the range of the most dominant frequencies of the combustor unsteady pressure data was in As mentioned earlier, at a high blowing ratio of M = 1.0, the coolant jet lift-off is generated under steady flow conditions (0 Hz), resulting in the entrainment of hot mainstream gases underneath the jet. The entrainment does not lead to much mixing near the wall [46]. If the oscillation frequency is increased from 0 to 90 Hz, more entrainment is induced under the cooling jet resulting in less disturbance and a lower increase of the heat transfer coefficient or the Stanton number ratio.…”
Section: Effects Of Multi-frequency Unsteady Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cold case presents the advantage to lead to a well known two temperatures problem. Indeed the injection temperature equals to the mainflow temperature, there is no more difficulty to calculate a heat transfer coefficient using the expression (1): ~0cv = ~0 d i s s i -~0arr--(Pray = he" (Tw -Te) (1) where Tw is the wall temperature measured by infrared thermography (Fig.3). We calculate its value along three ylD axes (y/D = -1.5, 0, and +1.5) (Fig.2).…”
Section: Heat Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when equation (2) is substituted in (3) along with effective free stream velocity the following equation is obtained: (4) χ' is the distance from the virtual origin of the internal boundary layer. It was argued earlier that an internal boundary layer starts growing whenever there is a sudden change in the surface conditions.…”
Section: (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%