2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full conjugate heat transfer modelling for steam turbines in transient operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect then, the method considers the influence of the low frequency variations on the high frequency components of the solution but neglects the converse. This assumption, that has shown to have no impact on the accuracy of the solution ( [11], [15], [16], [17], [18]) holds the key to the computational savings allowed by the method. Governing equations U component is obtained through a suitable lowpass filtering operation.…”
Section: Multi-scale Modelling (Msm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect then, the method considers the influence of the low frequency variations on the high frequency components of the solution but neglects the converse. This assumption, that has shown to have no impact on the accuracy of the solution ( [11], [15], [16], [17], [18]) holds the key to the computational savings allowed by the method. Governing equations U component is obtained through a suitable lowpass filtering operation.…”
Section: Multi-scale Modelling (Msm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through manipulation of the Navier-Stokes and solid conduction equations, as well as appropriate treatment of the solid-fluid interface boundary condition, the method allows to march in time the solid solution with a time-step that is not bound by the fluid domain. The method has been shown to allow considerable speed-up with respect to a monolithic fully-coupled (FC) solution-where the same solver is used for both Navier-Stokes and solid conduction, with energy conservation at the fluid-solid interface being implicitly satisfied-without loss of accuracy ( [15], [16], [17], [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation of a blade is very complicated due to its variable cross section and torsional shape, the complex and nonlinear steam flow field around it and their coupling effect (Choi et al, 1999;Chaibakhsh and Ghaffari, 2008;Wood and Morton, 1984;Fadl et al, 2018). Therefore, it is difficult to obtain accurate deformation of a blade using calculations and analyses based on theoretical formulas (Moheban and Young, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of the finite element method and computational fluid dynamics technology (Bhagi et al, 2018;Prabhunandan and Byregowda, 2018;Shukla and Harsha, 2015;Brahimi and Ouibrahim, 2016;Hashemian et al, 2020;Jang et al, 2015;Francesco et al, 2017), iterative solutions of the pre-deformation design method based on numerical calculations have gradually been used in blade analysis and optimal design (Noori Rahim Abadi et al, 2017;Obert and Cinnella, 2017;Pascoa et al, 2009;Hou et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2019;Yi et al, 2020a, b). With these methods, the construction of a hot shape and the correction of a cold shape are alternately and repeatedly executed in the pre-deformation design process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%