2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full-anisotropic poroelastic wave modeling: A discontinuous Galerkin algorithm with a generalized wave impedance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the DG framework has been used to solve the governing equations of poroelasticity [9,39,40,41]. de la Puente et al [9] combine ADER time stepping with the DG method using modal basis functions (using a deprecated version of SeisSol).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the DG framework has been used to solve the governing equations of poroelasticity [9,39,40,41]. de la Puente et al [9] combine ADER time stepping with the DG method using modal basis functions (using a deprecated version of SeisSol).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [39] use ADER time stepping similar to SeisSol and focus on the coupling between wave propagation in elastic and poroelastic materials. Zhan et al [41] also combine the DG method with Runge Kutta time stepping. However, they omit the stiff source term, by only considering inviscid fluids.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the quantities are the corresponding eigenvectors. A detailed derivation can be found in [23,26].…”
Section: Flux and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisotropic material behavior has been successfully included in Finite Difference schemes [11,22], pseudo-spectral methods [5], Spectral Element codes [13] and Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) schemes for the velocity-stress formulation [20] and for the velocity-strain formulation [26]. Only few open-source codes exist which are able to simulate seismic wave propagation in anisotropic materials and which are also tailored to run efficiently on supercomputers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed review of early studies is given in Carcione et al (2010). Different methods have been used, based on combined finite-volumes/differences on structured grids (Blanc et al, 2013;Carcione & Quiroga-Goode, 1995;Chiavassa et al, 2010;Chiavassa & Lombard, 2011;Dai et al, 1995;Masson et al, 2006;Özdenvar & McMechan, 1997;Wenzlau & Müller, 2009;Zeng et al, 2001;Zhu & McMechan, 1991), pseudo-spectral methods (Özdenvar & McMechan, 1997), discontinuous Galerkin methods (de la Puente et al, 2008;Dupuy et al, 2011;Shukla et al, 2019Shukla et al, , 2020Ward et al, 2017;Zhan et al, 2019), spectral element methods (Morency & Tromp, 2008), and finite-volume methods (Lemoine, 2016;Lemoine et al, 2013). Most of these studies implemented the corresponding equations as a first-order hyperbolic system and used explicit time integration schemes as it is convenient for the elastic wave propagation, except for (Morency & Tromp, 2008;Özdenvar & McMechan, 1997), where a ALKHIMENKOV ET AL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%