2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full ALD Ta 2 O 5 -based stacks for resistive random access memory grown with in vacuo XPS monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 a–c shows the XPS spectra of Ta 4f, Al 2p, and Ti 2p, respectively. Ta 4f 7/2 and Ta 4f 5/2 peaks were centered at 26.3 eV and 28.2 eV, respectively, at the surface (0 s) [ 34 ]. Subsequently, the suboxide was detected after 5 s because of the Ta-O-Al bond near the Ta 2 O 5 /Al 2 O 3 interface [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 a–c shows the XPS spectra of Ta 4f, Al 2p, and Ti 2p, respectively. Ta 4f 7/2 and Ta 4f 5/2 peaks were centered at 26.3 eV and 28.2 eV, respectively, at the surface (0 s) [ 34 ]. Subsequently, the suboxide was detected after 5 s because of the Ta-O-Al bond near the Ta 2 O 5 /Al 2 O 3 interface [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any particular niobate or tantalate can be characterized by a set of binding energies (BE) related to maximums of Nb 3d or Ta 4f and O 1s lines. However, a significant scattering exists in binding energy values reported in the literature Nb 3d 3/2 (210 eV) and Nb 3d 5/2 (207 eV) or Ta 4f 5/2 (28 eV) and Ta 4f 7/2 (26 eV) components even for such stable compounds as Nb 2 O 5 or Ta 2 O 5 . The binding energy differences Δ(O―Nb) = B E (O 1s) − B E (Nb 3d 5/2 ) and Δ(O―Ta) = B E (O 1s) − B E (Ta 4f 7/2 ) are suitable parameters to characterize average Nb―O bonding in niobates (322.2‐323.6 eV) and Ta―O bonding in tantalates (502.7‐504.4 eV) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Filamentary RS normally implies the necessity of an electroforming step for the RS initiation. [1][2][3][4][5] However, the process of filament formation is believed to be stochastic in nature, which leads to variations in the switching parameters. Even when the forming process can be appropriately performed in the discrete RS cells, the CBA structure experience the uncontrollable formation of the conductive filaments, which significantly reduces the array level uniformity and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%